Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 945

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Individualism-Collectivism: Critique and Proposed Refinements

Schwartz, Shalom H.·1990·Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology

Abstract

Three criticisms of the individualism-collectivism dichotomy are explicated. The dichotomy leads one to overlook values that inherently serve both individual and collective interests (e.g., wisdom), it ignores values that foster the goals of collectivities other than the ingroup (e.g., universal values, such as social justice), and it promotes the mistaken assumption that individualistic and collective values each form coherent syndromes that are in polar opposition. These problems are illustrated by applying a more fine-tuned analysis of ten types of values postulated to be present in all cultures (Schwartz, 1987) to data from four empirical studies. This analysis reveals meaningful group differences that are obscured by the individualism-collectivism dichotomy. As an impetus to future research, hypotheses are offered about the types of values likely to differ in importance between societies with a more collectivist (communal) social structure and those with a more individualistic (contractual) structure.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0022022190212001

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Durkheim, E., 1964, The division of labor in society
  2. Ellerman, D. A. (1975). Australian student activists: Some psychological characteristics. Unpublished M.A. thesis, Flinders University of South Australia. (cited in Feather, N. T. (1975). Values in education and society. New York: Free Press).
  3. Hofstede, G., 1980, Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values
  4. SchwartzsHui, C. H., 1986, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 17, 222
  5. 10.4159/harvard.9780674863507.c8 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1037/0022-3514.47.4.793 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.47.4.793 · Paper page
  7. Lipset, S. M., 1971, The politics of unreason: Rightwing extremism in America
  8. Parsons, T., 1951, The social system
  9. Rokeach, M., 1973, The nature of human values
  10. Schwartz, S. H., 1987, An invitation to collaborate in cross-cultural research on values
  11. Schwartz, S. H., Ninth International Association for Cross-Cultural Psychology, Newcastle
  12. 10.1037/0022-3514.53.3.550 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.53.3.550 · Paper page
  13. Schwartz, S. H., Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  14. 10.1007/978-94-010-9220-3_4 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Toennies, 1957, Community and society
  16. Triandis, H. C., Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1989
  17. 10.1080/00049538608259013 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1037/0022-3514.54.2.323 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1016/0092-6566(85)90008-X · DOI · Paper page
  20. Uutela, A., Ninth International Association for Cross-Cultural Psychology, Newcastle
  21. Williams, R. M., Jr., 1968, International encyclopedia of the social sciences
  22. Yang, K. S., 1986, The psychology of the Chinese people

Cited by

See all 945

Metadata

Authors
Schwartz, S. H.
Venue
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology
Published
1990-06
Volume
21
Issue
2
Pages
139-157
ISSN
  • 0022-0221 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5422
OpenAlex
W2168821532
Cited by
945
References
1
FWCI
9.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Individualism-Collectivism: Critique and Proposed Refinements. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0022022190212001
The paper
Schwartz, S. H. (1990). Individualism-Collectivism: Critique and Proposed Refinements. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022190212001

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.