The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Fourier Transform Infrared Analysis of Degree of Polymerization in Unfilled Resins—Methods Comparison
Abstract
Two methods of transmission Fourier Transform Infrared analysis were compared to determine the degree of polymerization (DP) in unfilled Bis-GMA-based dental resins. Diluent concentration, curing mode, and activator type were investigated. DP ranged from 55-72% and was highest for the most diluted resins. The effects of polymerization activation mode and type were insignificant. DP was slightly enhanced in the bulk of the resin, as determined by a KBr-pellet technique, in comparison with results from a thin film method, but both techniques seem to provide useful and reproducible results for dental resins.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ferracane, J. L., & Greener, E. H. (1986) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research · doi:10.1002/jbm.820200111 · Cited by 586
Self-citationInfluence of incorporation of antibacterial monomer on curing behavior of a dental composite
Imazato, S., & McCabe, J. F. (1994) · Journal of Dental Research · doi:10.1177/00220345940730100901 · Cited by 106
Metadata
- Authors
- Ferracane, J. L., & Greener, E. H.
- Venue
- Journal of Dental Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1984-08
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1093-1095
- ISSN
- 0022-0345 (ISSN-L)
- 1544-0591
- OpenAlex
- W2037207340
- Cited by
- 319
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fourier Transform Infrared Analysis of Degree of Polymerization in Unfilled Resins—Methods Comparison. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/00220345840630081901
- The paper
- Ferracane, J. L., & Greener, E. H. (1984). Fourier Transform Infrared Analysis of Degree of Polymerization in Unfilled Resins—Methods Comparison. Journal of Dental Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345840630081901
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
