The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Biochemical Effects of Fluoride on Oral Bacteria
Abstract
Fluoride inhibition of carbohydrate metabolism by the acidogenic plaque microflora is well-established, although it has not always been appreciated that oral bacteria vary considerably in their susceptibility to fluoride. Early studies demonstrated that the F-induced reduction in acid production was due, in part, to the inhibition of the glycolytic enzyme, enolase, which converts 2–P-gfycerate to P-enolpyruvate. The decreased output of PEP in the presence of F, in turn, results in the inhibition of sugar transport via the PEP phosphotransferase system (PTS). Bacterial accumulation of fluoride involves the transport of HF, a process requiring a transmembrane pH difference or pH gradient, which is generated only by metabolically active cells. The uptake of HF into the more alkaline cytoplasm results in the dissociation of HF to H + and F - and, if allowed to continue, the accumulation of protons acidifies the cytoplasm, causing a reduction in both the proton gradient and enzyme activity. Current information indicates that in addition to enolase, F - also inhibits the membrane-bound, proton-pumping H + /ATPase, which is involved in the generation of proton gradients through the efflux of protons from the cell at the expense of ATP. Thus, fluoride has the dual action of dissipating proton gradients and preventing their generation through its action on H*/ATPase. The collapse of transmembrane proton gradient, in turn, reduces the ability of cells to transport solutes via mechanisms involving proton motive force. In spite of these known effects on the bacterial cell, there is no general agreement that the anti-microbial effects of F contribute to the Anticaries effect of fluoride. The resolution of this question will require new information on the nature and concentration of F in plaque, the minimal level of F required to provide an Anticaries effect, and the influence of cellular integrity and activity on F uptake and accumulation by plaque bacteria.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Fluoride acts as an inhibitor for several bacterial enzymes, including enolases, phosphatases, proton-extruding ATPases, and pyrophosphatases.25”
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 90
- 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1976.tb00986.x · DOI
- 10.1016/0003-9969(80)90063-1 · DOI
- BEAZLEY V.C.C., 1980, Scand J Dent Res, 88, 193
- 10.1128/IAI.53.2.331-338.1986 · DOI
- 10.1177/00220345400190040601 · DOI
- 10.1159/000260190 · DOI
- 10.1159/000259744 · DOI
- BOREI H., 1945, Ark Kemi Miner Geol, 20, 1
- 10.1007/978-1-4615-8279-3_4 · DOI
- 10.1128/iai.36.1.247-254.1982 · DOI
- 10.1177/00220345740530031701 · DOI · Paper page
- BROWN L.R., 1976, Microbial Aspects of Dental Caries, 275
- 10.1177/00220345830620061201 · DOI
- 10.1159/000259632 · DOI
- 10.1016/0003-9969(69)90140-X · DOI
- 10.1159/000260430 · DOI
- DAWES C., 1965, Br Dent J, 119, 164
- EDGAR W.M., 1981, The Environment of the Teeth, 19
- 10.1016/0003-9969(81)90024-8 · DOI
- 10.1038/sj.bdj.4802436 · DOI
- 10.1016/0003-9969(80)90089-8 · DOI
- 10.1177/00220345800590072801 · DOI
- 10.1016/0003-9969(82)90061-9 · DOI
- 10.1016/0003-9969(82)90027-9 · DOI
- GEDDES D.A.M., 1988, Fluoride in Dentistry, 60
- 10.1128/iai.34.3.871-879.1981 · DOI
- 10.1128/iai.51.1.119-124.1986 · DOI
- GUGGENHEIM B., 1970, Int Dent J, 20, 657
- 10.1128/MMBR.44.2.331-384.1980 · DOI
- 10.1139/m69-181 · DOI
- 10.1139/m69-182 · DOI
- HAMILTON I.R., 1976, Microbial Aspects of Dental Caries, 683
- 10.1159/000260304 · DOI
- HAMILTON I.R., 1986, Molecular Microbiology and Immunobiology of Streptococcus mutans, 145
- HAMILTON I.R., 1987, Sugar Transport and Metabolism by Gram-positive Bacteria, 94
- HAMILTON I.R., 1988, Fluoride in Dentistry, 77
- 10.1128/iai.48.3.664-670.1985 · DOI
- 10.1128/iai.19.2.434-442.1978 · DOI
- 10.1016/B978-0-12-152506-4.50010-8 · DOI
- 10.1016/B978-0-12-395623-1.50020-4 · DOI
- JENKINS G.N., 1980, Borderland Between Caries and Periodontal Disease II, 269
- 10.1016/0003-9969(69)90025-9 · DOI
- 10.1159/000260302 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0003-9861(71)80053-X · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0003-9861(71)90366-3 · DOI
- 10.1016/0003-9969(78)90255-8 · DOI
- 10.1128/iai.48.1.19-22.1985 · DOI
- 10.1177/00220345850640110701 · DOI
- 10.1016/0003-9969(76)90103-5 · DOI
- 10.1159/000260283 · DOI
- 10.1016/0003-9969(81)90058-3 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00402337 · DOI
- 10.1159/000260423 · DOI
- KOBAYASHI H., 1987, Sugar Transport and Metabolism by Gram-positive Bacteria, 255
- KONINGS W.N., 1987, Sugar Transport and Metabolism by Gram-positive Bacteria, 270
- 10.1128/AAC.12.3.339 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1159/000259852 · DOI
- 10.1159/000260153 · DOI
- LOHMANN K., 1934, Biochem Z, 273, 60
- 10.1159/000260461 · DOI
- 10.1016/0003-9969(75)90047-3 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/00220345820610062701 · DOI
- 10.1177/00220345770560063301 · DOI
- 10.1177/00220345850640021501 · DOI
- MICHELS P.A.M., 1979, FEMS Utters, 5, 357
- 10.1177/00220345850640030101 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1469-185X.1966.tb01501.x · DOI
- 10.1016/S0003-9969(87)80004-3 · DOI
- 10.1016/0304-4157(81)90004-6 · DOI
- 10.1128/mr.51.4.498-508.1987 · DOI
- 10.1128/mr.49.3.232-269.1985 · DOI
- 10.1016/0003-9969(81)90072-8 · DOI
- SAIER M.H., 1986, Mechanisms and Regulation of Carbohydrate Transport in Bacteria
- 10.1016/0003-9969(69)90185-X · DOI
- 10.1159/000260304 · DOI
- 10.1177/00220345730520060801 · DOI
- 10.1016/0003-9969(74)90096-X · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/00220345780570092101 · DOI
- 10.1042/bj0311516 · DOI
- 10.1128/iai.55.11.2597-2603.1987 · DOI · Paper page
- TATEVOSSIAN A., 1980, Proc Finn Dent Soc, 76, 103
- 10.1177/00220345850640100601 · DOI
- 10.1177/0022034581060003S1001 · DOI
- 10.1128/iai.45.2.356-359.1984 · DOI
- 10.1177/00220345870660111101 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF01626558 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1965.tb34849.x · DOI
- 10.1128/iai.18.3.680-687.1977 · DOI
- 10.1159/000260699 · DOI
- 10.1128/iai.41.1.375-382.1983 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wackett, L. P. (2022) · Microbial Biotechnology · doi:10.1111/1751-7915.13928 · Cited by 165
Calero, P., Gurdo, N., & Nikel, P. I. (2022) · Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1111/1462-2920.16110 · Cited by 56
Dodge, A. G., Thoma, C. J., O’Connor, M. R., & Wackett, L. P. (2024) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.02785-23 · Cited by 23
Yörel, V. İ. (2025) · Cumhuriyet Dental Journal · doi:10.7126/cumudj.1626945 · Cited by 1
Baidya, D., Pathivada, L., Garg, N., Karthik, K. M., Jain, A. K., & Bhyri, P. (2026) · International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry · doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10005-3470
Metadata
- Authors
- Hamilton, I. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Dental Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1990-02
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 2_suppl
- Pages
- 660-667
- ISSN
- 0022-0345
- 1544-0591
- Cited by
- 239
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review