The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Validity of Self-Reported Data on Drug Use
Abstract
Surveys of drug use are continually criticized on the premise that respondents underreport the extent of their drug use. Validation studies conducted prior to the mid-1980s involving known samples of drug users or urinalysis techniques showed that drug use was fairly accurately reported in self-report surveys. However, more recent validation studies conducted with criminal justice clients using improved urinalysis techniques suggest less concordance between urinalysis and self-report. This paper reviews these studies and their implications for the validity of self-report in epidemiological drug surveys. Some general conclusions can be drawn from various validation studies. Valid self-reporting of drug use is a function of: 1) the recency of the event, 2) the social desirability of the drug, and 3) nuances of data collection methodology. The paper discusses methods used to improve the validity and quality of self-report data on drug use.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Self-report among injecting drug users: A review
Darke, S. (1998) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/s0376-8716(98)00028-3 · Cited by 1,141
A comprehensive and comparative review of adolescent substance abuse treatment outcome
Williams, R. J., Addiction Centre Adolescent Research Group, & Chang, S. Y. (2000) · Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice · doi:10.1093/clipsy.7.2.138 · Cited by 453
Does retention matter? Treatment duration and improvement in drug use
Zhang, Z., Friedmann, P. D., & Gerstein, D. R. (2003) · Addiction · doi:10.1046/j.1360-0443.2003.00354.x · Cited by 314
Langenbucher, J., & Merrill, J. (2001) · Evaluation Review · doi:10.1177/0193841x0102500204 · Cited by 52
Measurement Error in Criminal Justice Data
Pepper, J., Petrie, C., & Sullivan, S. (2010) · Handbook of Quantitative Criminology · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-77650-7_18 · Cited by 31
Metadata
- Authors
- Harrison, L. D.
- Venue
- Journal of Drug Issues
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1995-01
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 91-111
- ISSN
- 0022-0426 (ISSN-L)
- 1945-1369
- OpenAlex
- W2346115250
- Cited by
- 234
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 39.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Validity of Self-Reported Data on Drug Use. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/002204269502500107
- The paper
- Harrison, L. D. (1995). The Validity of Self-Reported Data on Drug Use. Journal of Drug Issues. https://doi.org/10.1177/002204269502500107
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.