Improving Educational Quality Through Curriculum Development: An Empirical Investigation Using Stakeholder Feedback Data
Abstract
Using feedback data from stakeholders, the study examines several aspects of the curriculum offered by a program offering entity (POE) in Bangladesh. Analysis of the data shows that the opinions of the stakeholders from various groups resonate together for evaluation areas like need assessment, curriculum mapping, and feedback mechanism. However, opinions expressed by students, both current and alumni, diverge from the opinions expressed by the academic community on matters like “program load.” The qualitative analysis of the text data obtained through some open-ended questions reveals that the respondents support an academic environment free from campus politics and incorporation of more courses related to Information Communication Technology (ICT) for curriculum development.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The work by Islam [134] helps in designing curriculum to support high-quality education.
“Helps in designing curriculum to support high-quality education”
From Artificial Intelligence for Assessment and Feedback to Enhance Student Success in Higher Education (2022) · cites this paper as [134]
Cites
Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511733031 · Cited by 1,514 · see citing works
A Curriculum Review and Mapping Process Supported by an Electronic Database System
Britton, M. L., Letassy, N. A., Medina, M. S., & Er, N. (2008) · American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education · doi:10.5688/aj720599 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Khalil, M. K., & Kibble, J. D. (2014) · AJP Advances in Physiology Education · doi:10.1152/advan.00055.2014 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Bangladesh Civil Service (BCS) Examination
Ara, F. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_4297-1 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Artificial Intelligence for Assessment and Feedback to Enhance Student Success in Higher Education
Hooda, M., Rana, C., Dahiya, O., Rizwan, A., & Hossain, M. S. (2022) · Mathematical Problems in Engineering · doi:10.1155/2022/5215722 · Cited by 444 · see citing works
Jha, S., Kaur, R., & Saklani, A. (2024) · Advances in higher education and professional development book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-1698-6.ch021 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
The Role of Madrasa Heads in Improving the Quality of Islamic Religious Education
Rusdi, R., Halim, S., & Hakim, R. (2022) · WARAQAT Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman · doi:10.51590/waraqat.v7i2.358 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
The interplay among leadership, language, and curriculum in improving education quality
Wolle, G. S. (2025) · Bahir Dar Journal of Education · doi:10.4314/10.4314/bdje.v25i2.1
- Authors
- Islam, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Chittagong (BD)
- Corresponding author
- Islam, Amirul
- Venue
- Journal of Education
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2019-04
- Volume
- 199
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 69-82
- ISSN
- 0022-0574 (ISSN-L)
- 2515-5741
- OpenAlex
- W2946572717
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 3
- FWCI
- 0.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Management and Quality
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Methods and Analysis
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Leadership and Administration
- Keywords
- curriculum development, educational quality, stakeholder feedback, needs assessment, curriculum mapping, feedback mechanisms, academic community, university politics, Bangladesh
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
