Cited by 27Intergenerational Family Dynamics and CaregivingAging and Gerontology ResearchFamily Dynamics and Relationships

Grandparenting and mortality: How does race-ethnicity matter?

Choi, Seung-won Emily·2020·Journal of Health and Social Behavior

Abstract

Little is known about whether and how intergenerational relationships influence older adult mortality. This study examines the association between caring for grandchildren (i.e., grandparenting) and mortality and how the link differs by race-ethnicity. Drawing from the Health and Retirement Study (1998-2014, N = 13,705), I found different racial-ethnic patterns in the effects of grandparenting on mortality risk. White grandparents who provide intensive noncoresident grandparenting (i.e., over 500 hours of babysitting per two years) and multigenerational household grandparenting have a lower risk of mortality compared to noncaregiving grandparents. In contrast, black grandparents have a higher mortality risk than their noncaregiving counterparts when providing intensive noncoresident, multigenerational household, and skipped-generation household (i.e., grandparent-headed family) grandparenting. Caregiving Hispanic grandparents are not significantly different from their noncaregiving counterparts in mortality risk. These findings suggest that important variations in social and cultural contexts for racial-ethnic groups shape the consequences of grandparenting for older adult mortality.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0022146520903282

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Grandparent caregivers report poorer self-rated health, increased functional impairment, exacerbation of chronic illness, and higher viral illness transmission compared to non-caregivers.

    “Grandparent caregivers—many managing chronic conditions (Boersma et al., 2020)—report poorer self-rated health, increased functional impairment, exacerbation of chronic illness, and higher viral illness transmission compared to non-caregivers (Choi, 2020; Danielsbacka et al., 2022; Grinstead et al., 2003; Minkler & Fuller-Thomson, 1999).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Choi, S.-W. E.
Affiliations
Texas Tech University (US)
Corresponding author
Choi, Seung-won Emily
Venue
Journal of Health and Social Behavior
Published
2020-02-13
Volume
61
Issue
1
Pages
96-112
ISSN
  • 0022-1465 (ISSN-L)
  • 2150-6000
OpenAlex
W3005827877
Cited by
27
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1
FWCI
5.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Health and Social Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
Keywords
grandparenting, racial and ethnic differences, intergenerational relations, multigenerational families, grandparent-headed families, sociocultural context
MeSH terms
Grandparents, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Black or African American, Child, Child Care, Ethnicity, Health Status, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Middle Aged, Minority Groups, Mortality, Surveys and Questionnaires, United States, Intergenerational Relations, White People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review