Cited by 15Intergenerational Family Dynamics and CaregivingAging and Gerontology ResearchHealth disparities and outcomes

The Implications of Intergenerational Relationships for Minority Aging: a Review of Recent Literature

Open access
Sneed, Rodlescia S., Chan, Athena C. Y.·2023·Current Epidemiology Reports

Abstract

Purpose of review This study aims to understand how intergenerational relationships impact minority aging in the USA. We reviewed studies published in the last 5 years that examine both familial and non-familial intergenerational relationships.Recent findings Intergenerational relationships can have positive and negative implications for minority aging. Minority older adults benefit most from these relationships when they increase social interaction and/or offer social support by reducing acculturative stress, providing emotional closeness, or increasing access to tangible resources. At the same time, these relationships can be sources of strain as they lead to burden among already disadvantaged groups.Summary Future studies should explore the impact of intergenerational relations among more diverse subgroups of older adults and identify mechanisms linking intergenerational relationships to health-related outcomes among minority older adults. Further, longitudinal cohort studies and randomized trials are needed to test mechanisms and evaluate the effectiveness of promising intergenerational interventions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40471-023-00319-x

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Caregiving can enhance resilience in some contexts through the development of strong social support networks and engagement in collective practices.

    “Due to disproportionate exposure to social inequalities and caregiving roles, women are at increased risk of chronic stress115; however, caregiving can also enhance resilience in some contexts, through the development of strong social support networks and engagement in collective practices116.”

    From Resilience and brain health in global populations (2025) · cites this paper as [116]

    The Grandparent Caregiving section (page unavailable) reports that caregiving is associated with fewer depressive symptoms for some Chinese grandparents and may convey health benefits in certain contexts. It does not establish that caregiving enhances resilience through developing strong social support networks or engaging in collective practices; the Intergenerational Programs section discusses social relationships, but not that proposed caregiving mechanism. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [11]Kuehne VS Melville J The state of our art: a review of theories used in intergenerational program research (2003–2014) and ways forward J Int Relationships 2014 12 4 317 346
  2. [52]Department of Health and Human Services. White House conference on aging. 1981; Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED215259.pdf.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sneed, R. S., & Chan, A. C. Y.
Affiliations
  • Wayne State University (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
Sneed, Rodlescia S.
Venue
Current Epidemiology Reports
Published
2023-02-09
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
44-50
ISSN
2196-2995 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4319662870
Cited by
15
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2
FWCI
0.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Epidemiology Reports (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • SocArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
  • SocArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nd)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (P30 AG015281)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
intergenerational relations, minority aging, older adults, social support, acculturative stress, family relationships, caregiver burden, intergenerational intervention, health outcomes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review