The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Major DNA Fragmentation Is a Late Event in Apoptosis
Open accessAbstract
Apoptosis, the terminal morphological and biochemical events of programmed cell death, is characterized by specific changes in cell surface and nuclear morphology. In addition, DNA fragmentation in an internucleosomal pattern is detectable in mass cultures of apoptotic cells. However, DNA fragmentation and nuclear morphological changes may not necessarily be associated events. In this study, we examined OVCAR-3 and KB human carcinoma cells using time-lapse video phase-contrast microscopy to characterize the surface and nuclear morphological features of apoptosis in response to treatment with either taxol or ricin. The surface morphological features of apoptosis were the same in both cell types and with both drugs. Using an in situ nick-translation histochemical assay, these single cells were also examined for DNA strand breaks during apoptosis. Surface morphological changes demonstrated discrete stages of cell rounding, surface blebbing, followed by cessation of movement and the extension of thin surface microspikes, followed much later by surface blistering and cell lysis. Nuclear features examined by DAPI cytochemistry demonstrated apoptotic nuclear condensation very early in this sequence, usually at the time of initial surface blebbing. The nick-translation assay, however, demonstrated DNA strand breaks at a much later time, only after the formation of separated apoptotic bodies or after final cell lysis. This study points out the differences between surface and nuclear morphological changes in apoptosis, and the large temporal separation between nuclear morphological changes and major DNA fragmentation detectable by this in situ technique. This result suggests caution in using in situ nick-translation as a direct correlate of internucleosomal DNA fragmentation in apoptosis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cytochemical Methods for the Detection of Apoptosis
Willingham, M. C. (1999) · Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry · doi:10.1177/002215549904700901 · Cited by 309
Self-citationFormigari, A., Irato, P., & Santon, A. (2007) · Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part C: Toxicology & Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.cbpc.2007.07.010 · Cited by 258
Filonova, L. H., Bozhkov, P. V., Brukhin, V. B., Daniel, G., Zhivotovsky, B., & Arnold, S. V. (2000) · Journal of Cell Science · doi:10.1242/jcs.113.24.4399 · Cited by 257
Clay, C. E., Namen, A. M., Atsumi, G.-I., Trimboli, A. J., Fonteh, A. N., High, K. P., & Chilton, F. H. (2001) · Journal of Investigative Medicine · doi:10.2310/6650.2001.33786 · Cited by 67
Stieber, A., Gonatas, J. O., Moore, J. S., Bantly, A., Yim, H.-S., Yim, M. B., & Gonatas, N. K. (2004) · Journal of the Neurological Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jns.2003.12.004 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Collins, J. A., Schandl, C. A., Young, K. K., Vesely, J., & Willingham, M. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1997-07
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 923-934
- ISSN
- 0022-1554 (ISSN-L)
- 1551-5044
- OpenAlex
- W2134634216
- Cited by
- 471
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Major DNA Fragmentation Is a Late Event in Apoptosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/002215549704500702
- The paper
- Collins, J. A., Schandl, C. A., Young, K. K., Vesely, J., & Willingham, M. C. (1997). Major DNA Fragmentation Is a Late Event in Apoptosis. Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1177/002215549704500702
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.