Cited by 298Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Vicarious Posttraumatic Growth in Psychotherapy

Arnold, Debora, Calhoun, Lawrence G., Tedeschi, Richard, Cann, Arnie·2005·Journal of Humanistic Psychology

Abstract

Previous investigations of the impact of trauma-related psychotherapy on clinicians have emphasized the hazardous nature of such work. The present study is the first exploration of clinicians’ perceptions of trauma work to investigate in depth the positive consequences of working with trauma survivors. A sample of 21 psychotherapists participated in a naturalistic interview exploring the impact of trauma work with a particular focus on (a) changes in memory systems and schemas about self and the world (the hallmarks of vicarious traumatization) and (b) perceived psychological growth. In addition to reporting several negative consequences, all of the clinicians in this sample described positive outcomes. These descriptions of positive sequelae are strikingly similar to reports of growth following directly experienced trauma and suggest that the potential benefits of working with trauma survivors may be significantly more powerful and far-reaching than the existing literature’s scant focus on positive sequelae would indicate.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0022167805274729

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • That 2005 study also described better understanding of a wide spectrum of human behavior, positive impact on spirituality, and greater recognition of personal strength.

    “Opisano również lepsze rozumienie szerokiego spektrum ludzkich zachowań, pozytywny wpływ na duchowość iwiększe uznanie siły osobistej.”
  • The first in-depth qualitative study on the positive impact of working with trauma on psychotherapists, conducted in 2005, found that 86% of respondents confirmed change in three categories of post-traumatic growth: positive self-perception, interpersonal relationships, and life philosophy.

    “Pierwsze dogłębne jakościowe badanie dotyczące pozytywnego wpływu pracy zosobami ztraumą upsychoterapeutów wykonano w2005 r. [14]. Aż 86% badanych potwierdziło zmianę wtrzech kategoriach wzrostu potraumatycznego: a) pozytywnym postrzeganiu siebie, b) relacjach interpersonalnych oraz c) filozofii życia.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Arnold, D., Calhoun, L. G., Tedeschi, R., & Cann, A.
Affiliations
  • Charlotte, North Carolina
  • University of North Carolina at Charlotte (US)
Venue
Journal of Humanistic Psychology
Published
2005-04
Volume
45
Issue
2
Pages
239-263
ISSN
  • 0022-1678 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-650X
OpenAlex
W2133069221
Cited by
298
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 15
FWCI
2.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Humanistic Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
vicarious posttraumatic growth, vicarious trauma, trauma survivors, psychotherapists, trauma-informed psychotherapy, clinician perceptions, memory systems, self-schemas, psychological growth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review