Cited by 36Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skillsDevelopmental and Educational NeuropsychologyMathematics Education and Pedagogy

Conservation Abilities, Visuospatial Skills, and Numerosity Processing Speed: Association With Math Achievement and Math Difficulties in Elementary School Children

Lambert, Katharina, Spinath, Birgit·2018·Journal of Learning Disabilities

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to investigate the associations between elementary school children’s mathematical achievement and their conservation abilities, visuospatial skills, and numerosity processing speed. We also assessed differences in these abilities between children with different types of learning problems. In Study 1 ( N = 229), we investigated second to fourth graders and in Study 2 ( N = 120), third and fourth graders. Analyses revealed significant contributions of numerosity processing speed and visuospatial skills to math achievement beyond IQ. Conservation abilities were predictive in Study 1 only. Children with math difficulties showed lower visuospatial skills and conservation abilities than children with typical achievement levels and children with reading and/or spelling difficulties, whereas children with combined difficulties explicitly showed low conservation abilities. These findings provide further evidence for the relations between children’s math skills and their visuospatial skills, conservation abilities, and processing speed and contribute to the understanding of deficits that are specific to mathematical difficulties.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0022219417690354

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some studies have found significant processing speed deficits in children with math disorder compared to typically-developing counterparts.

    “some studies have found significant PS deficits in children with MD when compared to their typically-developing counterparts12,19,20”
  • Comorbidity amongst math disorder, reading disorder, and ADHD has been associated with low processing speed.

    “comorbidity amongst MD, RD, and ADHD has also been associated with low PS, and the relationships between these deficits continue to be explored20,40–44.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lambert, K., & Spinath, B.
Affiliations
  • University of Tübingen (DE)
  • Heidelberg University (DE)
Corresponding author
Lambert, Katharina
Venue
Journal of Learning Disabilities
Published
2017-01-24
Volume
51
Issue
3
Pages
223-235
ISSN
  • 0022-2194 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4780
OpenAlex
W2770073486
Cited by
36
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Learning Disabilities (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Baden-Württemberg Ministry of Science, Education and the Arts
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
Keywords
visuospatial ability, mathematics achievement, mathematics learning difficulties, elementary school students, reading and spelling difficulties, cognitive ability
MeSH terms
Academic Success, Aptitude, Child, Female, Humans, Learning Disabilities, Male, Mathematics, Space Perception, Thinking, Visual Perception, Mathematical Concepts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review