Cited by 130Writing and Handwriting EducationDevelopmental and Educational NeuropsychologyReading and Literacy Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Diagnosing Learning Disabilities and Writing Remedial Prescriptions

Bannatyne, Alex·1968·Journal of Learning Disabilities

Abstract

Diagnosis is a concept with many labels, and many people in different disciplines or having different viewpoints may choose a particular term to their liking. Some part-synonyms used for discovering ‘what is wrong’ with fellow human beings are assessment, evaluation, task-analysis, investigation, check-up, finding out, observing behavior, problem-solving, etc. We will not be far away from a satisfactory definition of diagnosis if we accept Webster's three versions and slightly modify them. On this basis, a diagnosis is the act or process of deciding the nature of a disorder or disability by examination and through the examination making a careful investigation of the facts to determine the nature or basis of the problem. The final diagnosis is the decision from such an examination or investigation.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/002221946800100403

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Neale, Marie D., 1964, Neale Analysis of Reading Ability
  2. Spalding, R. B., 1962, The Writing Road to Reading
  3. Bannatyne, A. D., Paper (Published 1967) presented at the Third Annual Conference of the Association for Children with Learning Disabilities
  4. Frostig, Marianne, 1964, Developmental Test of Visual Perception
  5. Beery, K. E., 1967, Berry-Buktenica Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration (VMI); Parkinson Division
  6. Wepmar, J., 1958, Wepman Auditory Discrimination Test
  7. Drake, Charles, 1966, P.E.R.C. Auditory Discrimination Test
  8. Money, John, 1966, Road Map Test of Direction Sense
  9. Benton, A. L., 1959, Benton Protocol for Right-Left Discrimination: “Right-Left Discrimination and and Finger Localization: Development and Pathology
  10. Harris, 1947, Harris Test of Lateral Dominance
  11. Bene, E., 1966, Children's Version and Adult Version of the Family Relations Test; National Foundation for Educational Research
  12. Prechtl, H. F. R., 1962, Reading Disability
  13. Kinsbourne, M., 1963, Quart. J. of Exper. Psyc.
  14. Bannatyne, A. D., Paper (Published) Presented at the 1967 International Convocation on Children and Young Adults with Learning Disabilities, Home for Crippled Children

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Bannatyne, A.
Affiliations
Champaign, Illinois
Corresponding author
Bannatyne, Alex
Venue
Journal of Learning Disabilities
Published
1968-04
Volume
1
Issue
4
Pages
242-249
ISSN
  • 0022-2194 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4780
OpenAlex
W2068430068
Cited by
130
References
4
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
12.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Learning Disabilities (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Writing and Handwriting Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
Keywords
learning disabilities, diagnosis, diagnostic process, remedial education, special education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review