The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Auditory Analysis Test: An Initial Report
Abstract
A new test for auditory perception, the Auditory Analysis Test, was given to 284 children in kindergarten through grade 6. The instrument, consisting of 40 items, asks the testee to repeat a spoken word, then to repeat it again without certain specified phonemic elements - such as a beginning, ending or medially-positioned consonant sound. Seven categories of item difficulty were proposed. Test results varied, both within and between class groups. Performance tended to improve with age and grade placement. Pearson Product-Moment Correlations of individual AAT scores with Stanford Achievement Test reading scores yielded significant relationships (p<.01) ranging from .53 (grade 1) to .84 (grade 3). Analysis of errors supported the validity of test item difficulty and provided direction for the design of a treatment approach to auditory perceptual dysfunction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills
Wagner, R. K., & Torgesen, J. K. (1987) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.101.2.192 · Cited by 3,303
Share, D. L. (2008) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.584 · Cited by 1,022
Willcutt, E. G., Pennington, B. F., Olson, R. K., Chhabildas, N., & Hulslander, J. (2005) · Developmental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1207/s15326942dn2701_3 · Cited by 612
Willcutt, E. G., Pennington, B. F., Boada, R., Ogline, J. S., Tunick, R. A., Chhabildas, N. A., & Olson, R. K. (2001) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-843x.110.1.157 · Cited by 451
Morphological awareness, phonological awareness, and reading in English-Arabic bilingual children.
Saiegh-Haddad, E., & Geva, E. (2008) · Reading and Writing · doi:10.1007/s11145-007-9074-x · Cited by 306
Kaplan, B. J., Dewey, D. M., Crawford, S. G., & Wilson, B. N. (2001) · Journal of Learning Disabilities · doi:10.1177/002221940103400608 · Cited by 230
The Effects of Musical Training on Structural Brain Development: A Longitudinal Study
Hyde, K. L., Lerch, J., Norton, A., Forgeard, M., Winner, E., Evans, A. C., & Schlaug, G. (2009) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04852.x · Cited by 215
Deacon, S. H., Kieffer, M. J., & Laroche, A. (2014) · Scientific Studies of Reading · doi:10.1080/10888438.2014.926907 · Cited by 202
Wren, Y., Miller, L. L., Peters, T. J., Emond, A., & Roulstone, S. (2016) · Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2015_jslhr-s-14-0282 · Cited by 198
Assessing the Language of Children With Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Oram, J., Fine, J., Okamoto, C., & Tannock, R. (1999) · American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology · doi:10.1044/1058-0360.0801.72 · Cited by 105
The effects of biliteracy instruction on morphological awareness
Lyster, R., Quiroga, J., & Ballinger, S. (2013) · Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education · doi:10.1075/jicb.1.2.02lys · Cited by 100
(2007) · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Rosner, J., & Simon, D. P.
- Venue
- Journal of Learning Disabilities
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1971-08
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 384-392
- ISSN
- 0022-2194 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4780
- OpenAlex
- W2024723627
- Cited by
- 464
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
