The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Holistic/constructivist Principles of the Teaching/Learning Process: Implications for the Field of Learning Disabilities
Abstract
Structuralist philosophy, constructivist theory, and holistic beliefs define the learning enterprise in opposition to reductionistic behavioral learning theory and suggest that the task of schools is to help students develop new meanings in response to new experiences rather than to learn the meanings others have created. This change in the very definition of learning reveals principles of learning that beg consideration in designing classroom instruction. Twelve principles are drawn here from the structuralist, constructivist, and holist literature and are applied to teaching students with learning disabilities. Looking at learning from this paradigm, one can see a different classroom environment emerging, one in which instruction is seen through the eyes of the students rather than through preferred methodologies, mandated curricula, and student assessments and diagnoses.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979) · Harvard University Press eBooks · doi:10.4159/9780674028845 · Cited by 26,084
The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2017) · Aldine (Routledge reprint) · doi:10.4324/9780203793206 · Cited by 25,789
Vygotsky, L. S. (1964) · Bulletin of the Orton Society · doi:10.1007/bf02928399 · Cited by 20,704
Chomsky, N. (1957) · doi:10.1515/9783112316009 · Cited by 7,885
Cited by
Schraw, G., & Moshman, D. (1995) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/bf02212307 · Cited by 1,443
Constructivist values for instructional systems design: Five principles toward a new mindset
Lebow, D. (1993) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/bf02297354 · Cited by 417
Englert, C. S., Raphael, T. E., Anderson Helene M. Anthony, L. M., & Stevens, D. D. (1991) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/00028312028002337 · Cited by 383
Theoretical foundations of design thinking – A constructivism learning approach to design thinking
Pande, M., & Bharathi, S. V. (2020) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100637 · Cited by 325
Harris, K. R., Graham, S., & Mason, L. H. (2017) · Focus on Exceptional Children · doi:10.17161/foec.v35i7.6799 · Cited by 208
Metadata
- Authors
- Poplin, M. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Learning Disabilities
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1988-08
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 401-416
- ISSN
- 0022-2194 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4780
- OpenAlex
- W2120218494
- Cited by
- 219
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 45.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Holistic/constructivist Principles of the Teaching/Learning Process: Implications for the Field of Learning Disabilities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/002221948802100703
- The paper
- Poplin, M. S. (1988). Holistic/constructivist Principles of the Teaching/Learning Process: Implications for the Field of Learning Disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221948802100703
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.