Positive Mood and Math Performance
Abstract
Two studies are reported that assessed the impact of positive moods on students' feelings of self-efficacy and math performance. In the first study, 32 black and Hispanic girls and boys in the third to fifth grades, who had been identified by teachers as at risk for school failure, and a control sample of normally achieving classmates served as subjects. In the second study, 15 males and 3 females in junior high and high school attending a private school for students with learning disabilities served as subjects. In both studies, students were randomly assigned to a positive-mood induction condition or a no-treatment control condition. Following this, they completed a measure of self-efficacy for math and were then given 5 minutes to do 50 math problems. In both studies, analyses of covariance using standardized math scores as the adjustor variable found that children in the positive-mood condition completed significantly more problems accurately than children in the no-treatment control condition. In addition, in the junior high and high school sample, students in the positive-mood induction condition expressed greater self-efficacy for math than students in the control condition. The results of these two studies raise many questions about the role of affect, positive and negative, in the learning and performance of students with learning disabilities that researchers and teachers might explore.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Positive engagement with peers supports early reading and mathematics outcomes.
“to support key outcomes such as early reading and mathematics (Bryan & Bryan 1991, Coolahan et al. 2000, Fuchs et al. 2001).”
From School Readiness and Self-Regulation: A Developmental Psychobiological Approach (2015) · cites this paper as Bryan & Bryan 1991
Positive engagement with peers extends young children's attention and helps them encode and retrieve information.
“a number of studies have found positive engagement with peers to extend children’s attention, to support encoding and retrieval of information”
From School Readiness and Self-Regulation: A Developmental Psychobiological Approach (2015) · cites this paper as Bryan & Bryan 1991
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 24 · Cited by 101
- Authors
- Bryan, T., & Bryan, J.
- Affiliations
- Northwestern University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Learning Disabilities
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1991-10
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 490-494
- ISSN
- 0022-2194 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4780
- OpenAlex
- W2059701449
- Cited by
- 101
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Learning Disabilities (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
- Keywords
- positive mood, mathematics achievement, mathematics self-efficacy, mood induction, learning disabilities, at-risk students, elementary school students, high school students
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Affective Symptoms, Black or African American, Chicago, Child, Female, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Learning Disabilities, Male, Mathematics, Problem Solving, Risk Factors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review