Cited by 101Education, Achievement, and GiftednessCognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skillsMathematics Education and Pedagogy

Positive Mood and Math Performance

Bryan, Tanis, Bryan, James·1991·Journal of Learning Disabilities

Abstract

Two studies are reported that assessed the impact of positive moods on students' feelings of self-efficacy and math performance. In the first study, 32 black and Hispanic girls and boys in the third to fifth grades, who had been identified by teachers as at risk for school failure, and a control sample of normally achieving classmates served as subjects. In the second study, 15 males and 3 females in junior high and high school attending a private school for students with learning disabilities served as subjects. In both studies, students were randomly assigned to a positive-mood induction condition or a no-treatment control condition. Following this, they completed a measure of self-efficacy for math and were then given 5 minutes to do 50 math problems. In both studies, analyses of covariance using standardized math scores as the adjustor variable found that children in the positive-mood condition completed significantly more problems accurately than children in the no-treatment control condition. In addition, in the junior high and high school sample, students in the positive-mood induction condition expressed greater self-efficacy for math than students in the control condition. The results of these two studies raise many questions about the role of affect, positive and negative, in the learning and performance of students with learning disabilities that researchers and teachers might explore.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/002221949102400808

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Positive engagement with peers supports early reading and mathematics outcomes.

    “to support key outcomes such as early reading and mathematics (Bryan & Bryan 1991, Coolahan et al. 2000, Fuchs et al. 2001).”

    From School Readiness and Self-Regulation: A Developmental Psychobiological Approach (2015) · cites this paper as Bryan & Bryan 1991

  • Positive engagement with peers extends young children's attention and helps them encode and retrieve information.

    “a number of studies have found positive engagement with peers to extend children’s attention, to support encoding and retrieval of information”

    From School Readiness and Self-Regulation: A Developmental Psychobiological Approach (2015) · cites this paper as Bryan & Bryan 1991

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 24 · Cited by 101

Authors
Bryan, T., & Bryan, J.
Affiliations
Northwestern University (US)
Venue
Journal of Learning Disabilities
Published
1991-10
Volume
24
Issue
8
Pages
490-494
ISSN
  • 0022-2194 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4780
OpenAlex
W2059701449
Cited by
101
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Learning Disabilities (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
Keywords
positive mood, mathematics achievement, mathematics self-efficacy, mood induction, learning disabilities, at-risk students, elementary school students, high school students
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Affective Symptoms, Black or African American, Chicago, Child, Female, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Learning Disabilities, Male, Mathematics, Problem Solving, Risk Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review