The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cognitive Arithmetic and Problem Solving: A Comparison of Children with Specific and General Mathematics Difficulties
Open accessAbstract
This study examined problem-solving and number-fact skills in two subgroups of third-grade children with mathematics difficulties (MD): MD-specific ( n = 12) and MD-general ( n = 12). The MD-specific group had difficulties in mathematics but not in reading, and the MD-general group had difficulties in reading as well as in mathematics. A comparison group of nonimpaired children ( n = 24) also was included. The findings showed that on both story and number-fact problems, the MD-specific group performed worse than the nonimpaired group in timed conditions but not in untimed conditions. The MD-general group, on the other hand, performed worse than the nonimpaired group, regardless of whether tasks were timed or not. An analysis of children's strategies in untimed conditions showed that both the MD-specific and the MD-general groups relied more on backup strategies than the nonimpaired group. However, children in the MD-specific group executed backup strategies more skillfully than children in the MD-general group, allowing them to achieve parity with children in the nonimpaired group when tasks were not timed. The findings suggest that children with specific MD have circumscribed deficits associated with fact retrieval, whereas children with general MD have more basic delays associated with problem conceptualization and execution of calculation procedures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Developmental dyscalculia and basic numerical capacities: a study of 8–9-year-old students
Landerl, K., Bevan, A., & Butterworth, B. (2004) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2003.11.004 · Cited by 907
Geary, D. C., Hoard, M. K., Byrd-Craven, J., Nugent, L., & Numtee, C. (2007) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01069.x · Cited by 824
Rousselle, L., & Noël, M.-P. (2007) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2006.01.005 · Cited by 710
Comorbidity of learning disorders: prevalence and familial transmission
Landerl, K., & Moll, K. (2010) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2009.02164.x · Cited by 435
Dyslexia and dyscalculia: two learning disorders with different cognitive profiles
Landerl, K., Fussenegger, B., Moll, K., & Willburger, E. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2009.03.006 · Cited by 409
Metadata
- Authors
- Jordan, N. C., & Montani, T. O.
- Venue
- Journal of Learning Disabilities
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1997-11
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 624-634
- ISSN
- 0022-2194 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4780
- OpenAlex
- W2147013909
- Cited by
- 301
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cognitive Arithmetic and Problem Solving: A Comparison of Children with Specific and General Mathematics Difficulties. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/002221949703000606
- The paper
- Jordan, N. C., & Montani, T. O. (1997). Cognitive Arithmetic and Problem Solving: A Comparison of Children with Specific and General Mathematics Difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221949703000606
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.