Cited by 62Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skillsMathematics Education and PedagogyBehavioral and Psychological Studies

Effectiveness of the MASTER Program for Teaching Special Children Multiplication and Division

Van Luit, Johannes E. H., Naglieri, Jack A.·1999·Journal of Learning Disabilities

Abstract

In this study, the utility of a MAthematics Strategy Training for Educational Remediation (MASTER) program, (Van Luit, Kaskens, & Van der Krol, 1993) was examined. The effectiveness of the program, designed to encourage strategy utilization with multiplication and division problems, was investigated for 84 students with poor mathematics skills, some of whom had learning disabilities ( n = 42) and others with mild levels of mental retardation ( n = 42). The results showed that the use of the self-instruction program resulted in significant improvement over the general instruction program. Furthermore, far transfer was found for the children with learning disabilities in the experimental group when they used effective problem-solving strategies on nontrained tasks. The results are consistent with previous findings suggesting the importance of self-instruction in mathematics training programs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/002221949903200201

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Basic math skills play an important role in the development of students' later math skills.

    “The domain of basic math skills is large and plays an important role in the development of students' later math skills (Mercer & Miller, 1992; Van Luit & Naglieri, 1999).”

    From Mathematics Interventions for Children with Special Educational Needs: A Meta-Analysis (2003) · cites this paper as Van Luit & Naglieri, 1999

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Van Luit, J. E. H., & Naglieri, J. A.
Venue
Journal of Learning Disabilities
Published
1999-03
Volume
32
Issue
2
Pages
98-107
ISSN
  • 0022-2194 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4780
OpenAlex
W2169922779
Cited by
62
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Learning Disabilities (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Keywords
master's degree program, multiplication and division, self-education, learning disabilities, intellectual disability, children with special needs, far transfer, problem-solving strategies, remedial mathematics instruction
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Education of Intellectually Disabled, Education of Persons with Intellectual Disabilities, Education, Special, Female, Humans, Learning Disabilities, Male, Mathematics, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Problem Solving, Programmed Instructions as Topic, Models, Educational

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review