The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Marketing Revolution
Abstract
Business today, the author maintains, is in the throes of a marketing revolution. This revolution is based on a change of philosophy, and one of its effects will be the emergence of marketing as the dominant function in American business.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
From Marketing Mix to Relationship Marketing: Towards a Paradigm Shift in Marketing
Grönroos, C. (1994) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/00251749410054774 · Cited by 1,410
Re‐evaluating green marketing strategy: a stakeholder perspective
Rivera‐Camino, J. (2007) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/03090560710821206 · Cited by 270
A Stakeholder-Unifying, Cocreation Philosophy for Marketing
Lusch, R. F., & Webster, F. E. (2011) · Journal of Macromarketing · doi:10.1177/0276146710397369 · Cited by 223
Facebook and Finance: On the Social Logic of the Derivative
Arvidsson, A. (2016) · Theory, Culture & Society · doi:10.1177/0263276416658104 · Cited by 100
Metadata
- Authors
- Keith, R. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Marketing
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1960-01
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 35-38
- ISSN
- 0022-2429 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-7185
- OpenAlex
- W2318042838
- Cited by
- 583
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
