Facebook and Finance: On the Social Logic of the Derivative
Abstract
This article suggests that Facebook embodies a new logic of capitalist governance, what has been termed the ‘social logic of the derivative’. The logic of the derivative is rooted in the now dominant financial level of the capitalist economy, and is mediated by social media and the algorithmic processing of large digital data sets. This article makes three precise claims: First, that the modus operandi of Facebook mirrors the operations of derivative financial instruments. Second, that the algorithms that Facebook uses share a genealogy with those of derivative financial instruments – both are outcomes of the influence of the ‘cyber sciences’ on managerial practice in the post-war years. Third, that the future potential of Facebook lies in its ability to apply the logic of derivatives to the financial valuation of ordinary social relations, thus further extending the process of financialization of everyday life.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The more basic move in platform data extraction is the appropriation of the social itself, not merely technical methods of extracting value as financialization.
“Arvidsson (2016) analyses well the technical methods of extracting value from platform data as a form of financialization, but the more basic move is the appropriation of the social itself.”
From Data colonialism: rethinking big data’s relation to the contemporary subject (2019) · cites this paper as Arvidsson 2016
Data about one individual's actions or properties at one moment needs to be combined with data about other actions, moments, and properties to generate valuable relations between data points.
“second, data about one individual's actions or properties at one moment needs to be combined with data about other actions, moments, and properties to generate valuable relations between data points (Arvidsson 2016;Thatcher et al. 2016, 995).”
From Data colonialism: rethinking big data’s relation to the contemporary subject (2019) · cites this paper as Arvidsson 2016
Cites
An Engine, Not a Camera: How Financial Models Shape Markets
MacKenzie, D. (2006) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/9780262134606.001.0001 · Cited by 1,766 · see citing works
Labor in Informational Capitalism and on the Internet
Fuchs, C. (2010) · The Information Society · doi:10.1080/01972241003712215 · Cited by 630 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Data colonialism: rethinking big data’s relation to the contemporary subject
Couldry, N., & Mejias, U. A. (2019) · Television & New Media · doi:10.1177/1527476418796632 · Cited by 1,617 · see citing works
“The Computer Said So”: On the Ethics, Effectiveness, and Cultural Techniques of Predictive Policing
Karppi, T. (2018) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/2056305118768296 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
- Authors
- Arvidsson, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Milan (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Arvidsson, Adam
- ORCID
- Arvidsson, Adam
- Venue
- Theory, Culture & Society
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2016-07-29
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 3-23
- ISSN
- 0263-2764 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-3616
- OpenAlex
- W2502809704
- Cited by
- 100
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 16.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Theory Culture & Society (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
- Social Sciences › Communication › Cultural Studies and Postmodernism
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Economy and Marxism
- Keywords
- Facebook, derivatives, financialization, social media algorithms, algorithmic governance, cyberscience, management practices, digital data
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review