The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A General Model for Understanding Organizational Buying Behavior
Abstract
The authors suggest a model of industrial and institutional buying behavior as an organizational decision-making process. The major dimensions of the model are defined and some implications for marketing strategy are developed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Frambach, R. T., & Schillewaert, N. (2002) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/s0148-2963(00)00152-1 · Cited by 1,270
Ulaga, W., & Eggert, A. (2006) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/03090560610648075 · Cited by 762
Managing the sales force through the unexpected exogenous COVID-19 crisis
Hartmann, N. N., & Lussier, B. (2020) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.05.005 · Cited by 254
Impact of e‐procurement on procurement practices and performance
Quesada, G., González, M. E., Mueller, J., & Mueller, R. (2010) · Benchmarking: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/14635771011060576 · Cited by 74
Analyzing buyer behavior when selecting green criteria in public procurement
Igarashi, M., Boer, L. D., & Pfuhl, G. (2017) · Journal of Public Procurement · doi:10.1108/jopp-17-02-2017-b001 · Cited by 34
How digital startups use competitive intelligence to pivot
Sadeghiani, A., Shokouhyar, S., & Ahmadi, S. (2022) · Digital Business · doi:10.1016/j.digbus.2022.100034 · Cited by 20
Using MEC and FAHP to Establish an Evaluation Model for Food Processing Machinery Procurement
Chou, T.-Y., & Liao, J.-P. (2020) · Mathematical Problems in Engineering · doi:10.1155/2020/6395981 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Webster, F. E., & Wind, Y.
- Venue
- Journal of Marketing
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1972-04
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 12-19
- ISSN
- 0022-2429 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-7185
- OpenAlex
- W2320087742
- Cited by
- 913
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.