The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Taxonomy of Buying Decision Approaches
Abstract
The author reports the development of a classification scheme of buying patterns and situations. Unlike previous conceptual schemes, it consists of six prototypical “buying decision approaches” identified through an empirically based taxonomy development procedure. A mix of underlying buying activities distinguishes the categories: search for information, use of analysis techniques, focus on proactive issues, and reliance on control mechanisms. The use of a particular buying decision approach depends on four situational characteristics: purchase importance, task uncertainty, extensiveness of choice, and perceived buyer power. The findings reveal some patterns that are similar to previous classification schemes, but new variations allow for a conceptual extension of the literature. The resulting framework is useful to marketing managers, who can view their customer segments in terms of the categories in the taxonomy. Further, it provides a tool by which sales representatives can develop adaptive selling approaches based on a small set of buying situations and corresponding buying decision approaches.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs
Churchill, G. A. (1979) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224377901600110 · Cited by 16,549
Cited by
Factors affecting trust in market research relationships
Moorman, C., Deshpandé, R., & Zaltman, G. (1993) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299305700106 · Cited by 3,659
Buyer–Seller Relationships in Business Markets
Cannon, J. P., & Perreault, W. D. (1999) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224379903600404 · Cited by 1,755
A typology of online shoppers based on shopping motivations
Rohm, A. J., & Swaminathan, V. (2004) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/s0148-2963(02)00351-x · Cited by 1,019
Homburg, C., Stierl, M., & Bornemann, T. (2013) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jm.12.0089 · Cited by 427
Analyzing buyer behavior when selecting green criteria in public procurement
Igarashi, M., Boer, L. D., & Pfuhl, G. (2017) · Journal of Public Procurement · doi:10.1108/jopp-17-02-2017-b001 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Bunn, M. D.
- Venue
- Journal of Marketing
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1993-01
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 38-56
- ISSN
- 0022-2429 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-7185
- OpenAlex
- W2090288937
- Cited by
- 298
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 33.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Taxonomy of Buying Decision Approaches. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/002224299305700103
- The paper
- Bunn, M. D. (1993). Taxonomy of Buying Decision Approaches. Journal of Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299305700103
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.