The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Organizational Market Information Processes: Cultural Antecedents and New Product Outcomes
Abstract
Organizational research suggests that the way information is used is likely to be a function of the presence of organizational systems or processes, in addition to individual manager activities. The author suggests that firms vary their emphasis on certain organizational market information processes, such as information acquisition, information transmission, conceptual use of information, and instrumental use of information. The author argues that the emphasis is determined, in part, by the congruence, or fit, among an organization's cultural norms and values and theorizes that the presence of these organizational information processes affects new product outcomes. Survey results indicate that clans dominate the other cultures in predicting organizational market information processes, suggesting that information processes are fundamentally “people processes” that involve commitment and trust among organizational members. The results have important implications for balancing internal and external orientations within firms. The results also indicate that the information utilization processes, especially those that are conceptual in nature, are strong predictors of new product performance, timeliness, and creativity, indicating that competitive advantage is tied to information utilization activities in firms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing
Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299405800302 · Cited by 22,355
A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs
Churchill, G. A. (1979) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224377901600110 · Cited by 16,549
Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys
Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3150783 · Cited by 12,222
Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective
Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1997) · Reis · doi:10.2307/40183951 · Cited by 11,113 · cited 1×
“Evaluation, or performance feedback, has been described as being crucial to successful organizational adaptation (Fiol and Lyles 1985) and change (Argyris 1976).”
BackgroundEstimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys
Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224377701400320 · Cited by 10,390
Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures
Huber, G. P. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.88 · Cited by 8,072
Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development
Leonard-Barton, D. (1992) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250131009 · Cited by 6,477
Practical issues in structural modeling
BENTLER, P. M., & CHOU, C.-P. (1987) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124187016001004 · Cited by 5,804
Moorman, C., Zaltman, G., & Deshpande, R. (1992) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224379202900303 · Cited by 1,901
Self-citation
Cited by
Hurley, R. F., & Hult, G. T. M. (1998) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299806200303 · Cited by 3,971
Organizational improvisation and organizational memory
Moorman, C., & Miner, A. S. (1998) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259058 · Cited by 1,248
Self-citationAtuahene-Gima, K., & Ko, A. (2001) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.12.1.54.10121 · Cited by 1,008
The Role of Relational Information Processes and Technology Use in Customer Relationship Management
Jayachandran, S., Sharma, S., Kaufman, P., & Raman, P. (2005) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.2005.69.4.177 · Cited by 966
The effects of entrepreneurial orientation and marketing information on the performance of SMEs
Keh, H. T., Nguyen, T. T. M., & Ng, H. P. (2007) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2006.05.003 · Cited by 943
Metadata
- Authors
- Moorman, C.
- Venue
- Journal of Marketing Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1995-08
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 318-335
- ISSN
- 0022-2437 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-7193
- OpenAlex
- W2327104519
- Cited by
- 1,020
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 50.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Organizational Market Information Processes: Cultural Antecedents and New Product Outcomes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/002224379503200307
- The paper
- Moorman, C. (1995). Organizational Market Information Processes: Cultural Antecedents and New Product Outcomes. Journal of Marketing Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224379503200307
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.