The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Consumers’ Perceptions of the Assortment Offered in a Grocery Category: The Impact of Item Reduction
Abstract
Grocery retailers have been informed that, to remain competitive, they must reduce the number of stockkeeping units (SKUs) offered, in line with consumer demand, or, in other words, adopt “Efficient Assortment.” Retailers have resisted this principle on the basis of a fear that eliminating items would lower consumer assortment perceptions and decrease the likelihood of store choice. In two studies, the authors examine how consumers form assortment perceptions in the face of SKU reduction with a particular emphasis on two heuristic cues: the availability of a favorite product and the amount of shelf space devoted to the category. Results indicate that retailers might be able to make substantive reductions in the number of items carried without negatively affecting assortment perceptions and store choice, as long as only low-preference items are eliminated and category space is held constant. Thus, the potential risk inherent in item reduction might be more limited than initially thought. The authors then discuss the implications of these findings for retailers, as well as additional measurement considerations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An Examination of Consumer Decision Making for a Common Repeat Purchase Product
Hoyer, W. D. (1984) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209017 · Cited by 776
Self-citationPromotion Signal: Proxy for a Price Cut?
Inman, J. J., McAlister, L., & Hoyer, W. D. (1990) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/208538 · Cited by 483
Self-citation
Cited by
Understanding customer experience throughout the customer journey
Lemon, K. N., & Verhoef, P. C. (2016) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jm.15.0420 · Cited by 5,765
Customer experience creation: Determinants, dynamics and management strategies
Verhoef, P. C., Lemon, K. N., Parasuraman, A., Roggeveen, A., Tsiros, M., & Schlesinger, L. A. (2009) · Journal of Retailing · doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2008.11.001 · Cited by 3,140
Brands and Branding: Research Findings and Future Priorities
Keller, K. L., & Lehmann, D. R. (2006) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.1050.0153 · Cited by 2,323
Lamberton, C., & Stephen, A. T. (2016) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jm.15.0415 · Cited by 1,127
Can There Ever Be Too Many Options? A Meta-Analytic Review of Choice Overload
Scheibehenne, B., Greifeneder, R., & Todd, P. M. (2010) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/651235 · Cited by 1,070
Metadata
- Authors
- Broniarczyk, S. M., Hoyer, W. D., & McAlister, L.
- Venue
- Journal of Marketing Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1998-05
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 166-176
- ISSN
- 0022-2437 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-7193
- OpenAlex
- W4243937001
- Cited by
- 424
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 28.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Consumers’ Perceptions of the Assortment Offered in a Grocery Category: The Impact of Item Reduction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/002224379803500203
- The paper
- Broniarczyk, S. M., Hoyer, W. D., & McAlister, L. (1998). Consumers’ Perceptions of the Assortment Offered in a Grocery Category: The Impact of Item Reduction. Journal of Marketing Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224379803500203
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.