An Examination of Consumer Decision Making for a Common Repeat Purchase Product
Abstract
Despite the large amount of theory and research on consumer choice, current understanding is still at a less than desirable level—especially in the cases where involvement with or importance of the choice is low and the product is purchased frequently. The present paper provides a view of decision making based on the notion that consumers are not motivated to engage in a great deal of in-store decision making at the time of purchase when the product is purchased repeatedly and is relatively unimportant. As a result, consumers tend to apply very simple choice rules or tactics that provide a satisfactory choice while allowing a quick and effortless decision. An empirical test of this proposition is provided and implications are discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The likelihood of engaging in the same behavior in the next period increases if the consumer chose that behavior in the most recent time period and has a high overall rate of the past behavior.
“The likelihood of engaging in the same behavior in the next period increases if the consumer (a) chose that behavior in the most recent (immediately preceding) time period, and (b) has a high overall rate , or frequency, of the past behavior.”
From On or Off Track: How (Broken) Streaks Affect Consumer Decisions (2023) · cites this paper as Hoyer 1984
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Understanding customer experience throughout the customer journey
Lemon, K. N., & Verhoef, P. C. (2016) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jm.15.0420 · Cited by 5,765 · see citing works
Dimensions of Consumer Expertise
Alba, J. W., & Hutchinson, J. W. (1987) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209080 · Cited by 4,375 · see citing works
A benefit congruency framework of sales promotion effectiveness
Chandon, P., Wansink, B., & Laurent, G. (2000) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.64.4.65.18071 · Cited by 1,518 · see citing works
Reinartz, W. J., & Kumar, V. (2000) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.64.4.17.18077 · Cited by 1,364 · see citing works
Shiau, W.-L., & Luo, M. M. (2012) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.07.030 · Cited by 471 · see citing works
Explaining the consumer decision-making process: Critical literature review
Stankevich, A. (2017) · JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS RESEARCH AND MARKETING · doi:10.18775/jibrm.1849-8558.2015.26.3001 · Cited by 308 · see citing works
Zhang, T. (., Agarwal, R., & Lucas, H. C. (2011) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/41409964 · Cited by 233 · see citing works
Spence, C., & Velasco, C. (2018) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2018.03.008 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
Jung, J., Bapna, R., Golden, J. M., & Sun, T. (2020) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2019.0873 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
On or Off Track: How (Broken) Streaks Affect Consumer Decisions
Silverman, J., & Barasch, A. (2023) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1093/jcr/ucac029 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hoyer, W. D.
- Corresponding author
- Hoyer, Wayne D.
- Venue
- Journal of Consumer Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1984-12
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 822
- ISSN
- 0093-5301 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5277
- OpenAlex
- W2058990455
- Cited by
- 776
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 38 · 2013: 48 · 2012: 33
- FWCI
- 2.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Consumer Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior and Marketing Influence
- Keywords
- purchase decision, repeat purchase, choice rules, low-involvement products
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review