The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Visual Attention to Repeated Print Advertising: A Test of Scanpath Theory
Abstract
The authors examine consumers’ visual attention during repeated exposures to print advertisements using eye-tracking methodology. The authors propose a statistical model comprising submodels for two key measures of visual attention to elements of the advertisement: attention duration and inter- and intraelement saccades. These measures are vital to understanding attention wear-out and the impact of repetition on advertising effectiveness but have not been considered in previous research. The results of two studies show that (1) attention duration decreases significantly across advertising repetitions and (2) attentional scanpaths, as measured through saccades, remain constant across advertising repetitions and across experimentally induced and naturally occurring conditions. Scanpaths obey a stationary, reversible, first-order Markov process. The authors offer implications for attention theory and advertising processing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
McCullagh, P., & Nelder, J. A. (1989) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-3242-6 · Cited by 16,836
Bozdogan, H. (1987) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02294361 · Cited by 4,468
The role of involvement in attention and comprehension processes
Celsi, R. L., & Olson, J. C. (1988) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209158 · Cited by 2,070
Effects of message repetition and position on cognitive response, recall, and persuasion.
Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1979) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.1.97 · Cited by 813
Visual attention during brand choice: The impact of time pressure and task motivation
Pieters, R., & Warlop, L. (1999) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/s0167-8116(98)00022-6 · Cited by 603
Self-citationPreattentive Mere Exposure Effects
Janiszewski, C. (1993) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209356 · Cited by 455
Cited by
Novelty and collective attention
Wu, F., & Huberman, B. A. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0704916104 · Cited by 608
Visual attention during brand choice: The impact of time pressure and task motivation
Pieters, R., & Warlop, L. (1999) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/s0167-8116(98)00022-6 · Cited by 603
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Pieters, R., Rosbergen, E., & Wedel, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Marketing Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1999-11
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 424-438
- ISSN
- 0022-2437 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-7193
- OpenAlex
- W2146395977
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 7.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.