Preattentive Mere Exposure Effects
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Familiarity reflecting prior encounters with the same service or product indicates recognition of reliable information about the provider's services or products.
“Familiarity reflecting prior encounters with the same service or product indicates the recognition of reliable information about the provider's services or products [41,42].”
From Consumer Responses to Generative AI Chatbots Versus Search Engines for Product Evaluation (2025) · cites this paper as [42]
Single-item measures of familiarity are well-established and have been used in consumer behavior and psychology research due to their efficiency and validity.
“Single-item measures of familiarity are well-established and have been used in consumer behavior and psychology research due to their efficiency and validity [42,85,89,90].”
From Consumer Responses to Generative AI Chatbots Versus Search Engines for Product Evaluation (2025) · cites this paper as [42]
Familiarity is a clear and unidimensional construct.
“Familiarity is a clear and unidimensional construct [42,85].”
From Consumer Responses to Generative AI Chatbots Versus Search Engines for Product Evaluation (2025) · cites this paper as [42]
Cites
Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968–1987.
Bornstein, R. F. (1989) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.106.2.265 · Cited by 1,970 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Zhu, F., & Zhang, X. (2010) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.74.2.133 · Cited by 2,372 · see citing works
Petty, R. E., Wegener, D. T., & Fabrigar, L. R. (1997) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.48.1.609 · Cited by 2,290 · see citing works
“…more often a person encounters a novel (usually neutral) attitude object, the more favorable he or she is likely to evaluate that object; this effect is stronger when exposure to the object is subliminal rather than supraliminal (Bornstein & D’Agostino 1992, Janiszewski 1993; cf Murphy et al 1995).”
BackgroundCustomer Experience Management in Retailing: Understanding the Buying Process
Puccinelli, N. M., Goodstein, R. C., Grewal, D., Price, R., Raghubir, P., & Stewart, D. (2009) · Journal of Retailing · doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2008.11.003 · Cited by 1,008 · see citing works
The Effect of Conceptual and Perceptual Fluency on Brand Evaluation
Lee, A. Y., & Labroo, A. (2004) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.41.2.151.28665 · Cited by 951 · see citing works
“Research in consumer behavior has also shown that incidental exposure to logos, brand names, or pictures of objects may lead to more favorable product evaluations (e.g., Janiszewski 1993).”
BackgroundResultThe Value of Organizational Reputation in the Recruitment Context: A Brand-Equity Perspective
Cable, D., & Turban, D. (2003) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2003.tb01883.x · Cited by 709 · see citing works
“encourages consumers to have a more favorable attitude toward the brand, even when the consumer cannot recollect the initial exposure (Janiszewski, 1993).”
BackgroundInternet advertising: Is anybody watching?
Drèze, X., & Hussherr, F.-X. (2003) · Journal of Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1002/dir.10063 · Cited by 704 · see citing works
“Russo and Leclerc (1994) studied in-store brand choice, Fischer et al (1989) studied warning labels on tobacco ads, Janiszewski (1998) looked at exploratory search behavior with catalogs, Kroeber-Riel (1979) investigated the effect of arousal on advertising copy processing, and Lohse (1997) studied Yellow Page adverti…”
BackgroundHekkert, P., Snelders, D., & van Wieringen, P. V. (2003) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1348/000712603762842147 · Cited by 594 · see citing works
“Evidence for this is provided by the nding that preference is positively related to exposure frequency, even when participants fail to recall that they have actually seen the stimuli (e.g. Janiszewski, 1993; Kunst-Wilson & Zajonc, 1980; Murphy & Zajonc, 1993).”
BackgroundEstablishing the dimensions, sources and value of job seekers' employer knowledge during recruitment
Cable, D., & Turban, D. (2001) · Research in personnel and human resources management · doi:10.1016/s0742-7301(01)20002-4 · Cited by 560 · see citing works
“For example, Janiszewski (1993) found that exposure to a brand name encouraged consumers to have a more favorable attitude toward that brand even when the consumer could not recall the initial exposure to the brand.”
BackgroundRishika, R., Kumar, A., Janakiraman, R., & Bezawada, R. (2013) · Information systems research · doi:10.1287/isre.1120.0460 · Cited by 550 · see citing works
“1 Next, a mere exposure effect may also exist that may make the firm more accessible to the customer (Janiszewski 1993).”
BackgroundArt Infusion: The Influence of Visual Art on the Perception and Evaluation of Consumer Products
Hagtvedt, H., & Patrick, V. (2008) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.45.3.379 · Cited by 547 · see citing works
Modeling the Clickstream: Implications for Web-Based Advertising Efforts
Chatterjee, P., Hoffman, D., & Novak, T. (2003) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.22.4.520.24906 · Cited by 544 · see citing works
Branding the brain: A critical review and outlook
Plaßmann, H., Ramsøy, T. Z., & Milosavljevic, M. (2012) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2011.11.010 · Cited by 628 · see citing works
“Implicit brand memory As shown by several recent reports during the past few decades, the search for unconscious processes and implicit measures of branding is an active field of inquiry in consumer psychology (Baker, 2003; Bargh, 2002; Brasel and Gips, 2011; Chartrand et al., 2008; Claudi, Dimofte and Yalch, 2011; Fr…”
BackgroundSponsorship Disclosure: Effects of Duration on Persuasion Knowledge and Brand Responses
Boerman, S., van Reijmersdal, E. V., & Neijens, P. (2012) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01677.x · Cited by 436 · see citing works
Mogilner, C., Rudnick, T., & Iyengar, S. (2008) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/588698 · Cited by 407 · see citing works
“In the mere exposure effect, exposing consumers to a brand name is shown to instill more positive brand attitudes (Janiszewski 1993; Zajonc 1980).”
BackgroundYang, S., & Ghose, A. (2010) · Marketing science (Providence, R.I.) · doi:10.1287/mksc.1090.0552 · Cited by 403 · see citing works
“…Hawkins and Hoch, 1992; Law, and Braun, 2000), and the mere exposure effect (the formulation of a positive affect from exposure to a brief stimulus, Janiszewski 1993) both illustrate changes in consumer behavior following a single exposure to a stimuli without awareness of the prior exposure.”
BackgroundShim, M., Kelly, B., & Hornik, R. (2006) · Journal of health communication · doi:10.1080/10810730600637475 · Cited by 403 · see citing works
“In the advertising literature, this form of exposure is sometimes called ‘‘incidental’’ or ‘‘mere’’ exposure (Janiszewski, 1993; Shapiro, MacInnis, & Heckler, 1997; Shapiro, 1999).”
BackgroundEffects of Brand Logo Complexity, Repetition, and Spacing on Processing Fluency and Judgment
Janiszewski, C., & Meyvis, T. (2001) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/321945 · Cited by 397 · see citing works
“Janiszewski (1988, 1990, 1993) finds that incidental exposure to advertisements can influence liking for an advertisement and for the brand names and product packages included in the advertisement (see also Anand, Holbrook, and Stephens 1988).”
BackgroundSelf-citationHong, W.-Y., Thong, J. Y., & Tam, K. (2004) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2004.11045812 · Cited by 381 · see citing works
“that mere exposure to brand name or product information can have a positive effect on consumers’ attitude toward the product [35, 67].”
BackgroundI'll Have What She's Having: Gauging the Impact of Product Placements on Viewers
Law, S., & Braun, K. A. (2000) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/1520-6793(200012)17:12 · Cited by 360 · see citing works
The Impact of Regulatory Focus on Adolescents’ Response to Antismoking Advertising Campaigns
Zhao, G.-Z., & Pechmann, C. (2007) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.44.4.671 · Cited by 354 · see citing works
Is the Implicit Association Test a Valid and Valuable Measure of Implicit Consumer Social Cognition
Brunel, F., Tietje, B. C., & Greenwald, A. (2004) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15327663jcp1404_8 · Cited by 343 · see citing works
“For example, research on incidental ad exposure (Janiszewski, 1993; Shapiro, 1999) assumes that preferences are “formed independently of conscious processing” (Janiszewski, 1988, p.”
BackgroundExploring children's choice: the reminder effect of product placement
Auty, S., & Lewis, C. (2004) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.20025 · Cited by 340 · see citing works
“Shapiro, MacInnis, Heckler, and Perez (1999), building on earlier work of Janiszewski (1988, 1993) and an earlier study (Shapiro, MacInnis, & Heckler, 1997), indicate that advertisements, even if not explicitly recalled or recognized, may influence consumers especially with regard to the inclusion of a brand in a cons…”
BackgroundMatthes, J., Schemer, C., & Wirth, W. (2007) · International Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/02650487.2007.11073029 · Cited by 326 · see citing works
“Surprisingly, this aspect has rarely been taken into account in previous research: studies testing the effectiveness of placements mostly work with simple placement contexts, such as slideshows of placements or newspaper articles (Janiszewski 1993; see also Baker 1999).”
ResultBuijzen, M., van Reijmersdal, E. V., & Owen, L. (2010) · Communication Theory · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2010.01370.x · Cited by 324 · see citing works
“This facilitated processing fluency leads to a sense of familiarity that may, in turn, be misconstrued as a beneficial quality, resulting in positive affect toward the brand (Jacoby, Kelley, & Dywan, 1989; Janiszewski, 1993).”
Cox, D., & Cox, A. D. (2002) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1177/03079459994371 · Cited by 324 · see citing works
Between Two Brands: A Goal Fluency Account of Brand Evaluation
Labroo, A., & Lee, A. Y. (2006) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.43.3.374 · Cited by 310 · see citing works
“Mental representations of brands are multidimensional and are composed of different kinds of information (Keller 2003).”
BackgroundBart, Y., Stephen, A., & Sarvary, M. (2014) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmr.13.0503 · Cited by 308 · see citing works
Visual attention to advertising: A segment-level analysis
Rosbergen, E., Pieters, R., & Wedel, M. (1997) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209512 · Cited by 306 · see citing works
“Besides, research shows that average exposure durations to advertisements tend to be significantly shorter when consumers control exposure (e.g., Kiss and Wettig 1972) than when experimenters control exposure (Janiszewski 1993; Kroeber-Riel 1984).”
Shapiro, S. (1999) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209548 · Cited by 284 · see citing works
Of Frog Wines and Frowning Watches: Semantic Priming, Perceptual Fluency, and Brand Evaluation
Labroo, A., Dhar, R., & Schwarz, N. (2008) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/523290 · Cited by 303 · see citing works
A Dual-Process Perspective on Fluency-Based Aesthetics
Graf, L. K. M., & Landwehr, J. R. (2015) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868315574978 · Cited by 328 · see citing works
“…and cognitive elaboration, such as research conducted within the mere exposure paradigm, which shows that affective reactions toward stimuli are evoked outside of conscious awareness and independent of cognitive resources (Janiszewski, 1993; Kunst-Wilson & Zajonc, 1980; Murphy & Zajonc, 1993).”
BackgroundConsideration Sets and Competitive Marketing
Eliaz, K., & Spiegler, R. (2006) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.1093/restud/rdq016 · Cited by 291 · see citing works
Berger, J., & Fitzsimons, G. (2008) · doi:10.1509/jmkr.45.1.001 · Cited by 279
Shining in the Center: Central Gaze Cascade Effect on Product Choice
Atalay, S., Bodur, H., & Rasolofoarison, D. (2012) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/665984 · Cited by 278 · see citing works
Experiencing Interactive Advertising beyond Rich Media
Grigorovici, D., & Constantin, C. (2004) · Journal of Interactive Advertising · doi:10.1080/15252019.2004.10722091 · Cited by 278 · see citing works
“Within the context of product placement, Janiszewski (1993) found implicit memory processes at work due to preattentive processing of placements; although participants did not recall exposure to the brands, mere exposure resulted in more favorable attitudes towards the brands.”
BackgroundGibson, B. (2008) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/527341 · Cited by 275 · see citing works
Luce, M. F. (2015) · doi:10.1002/9781118468333.ch31 · Cited by 266 · see citing works
Visual Attention to Repeated Print Advertising: A Test of Scanpath Theory
Pieters, R., Rosbergen, E., & Wedel, M. (1999) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224379903600403 · Cited by 264 · see citing works
The Online Marketing of Food to Children: Is It Just Fun and Games?
Moore, E. S., & Rideout, V. J. (2007) · Journal of Public Policy & Marketing · doi:10.1509/jppm.26.2.202 · Cited by 262 · see citing works
Fleck, N., & Quester, P. (2007) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.20192 · Cited by 258 · see citing works
Shaouf, A., Lü, K., & Li, X.-Y. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.090 · Cited by 256 · see citing works
Shapiro, S., & Krishnan, H. S. (2001) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/00913367.2001.10673641 · Cited by 255 · see citing works
Harris, J. L., Brownell, K. D., & Bargh, J. A. (2009) · Social Issues and Policy Review · doi:10.1111/j.1751-2409.2009.01015.x · Cited by 252 · see citing works
“Research conducted with adults has confirmed the mere exposure effect on brand attitude and choice (Baker, 1999; Janiszewski, 1993).”
BackgroundConsideration-set heuristics ☆
Hauser, J. (2014) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.02.015 · Cited by 250 · see citing works
“” Many marketing actions attempt to make consumers familiar with a brand in the hopes that consumers will choose familiar brands – sufficient exposure to a brand name is often sufficient to enhance positive attitudes toward the brand (Zajonc 1968; Janiszewski 1993).”
BackgroundNelson, M. R., Yaros, R. A., & Keum, H. (2006) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.2753/joa0091-3367350406 · Cited by 238 · see citing works
“In the consumer research realm, such effects were measured when exposure to the stimuli occurred during incidental learning (i.e., when completing another task; see, e.g., Janiszewski 1993).”
BackgroundNing, L.-W., Niu, J., Bi, X.-J., Yang, C., Liu, Z., Wu, Q.-H., Ning, N., Liang, L.-B., Liu, A.-S., Hao, Y.-H., et al. (2020) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-020-09892-y · Cited by 227 · see citing works
“The impact of information on the cognition and emotion of the public is called by some scholars the exposure effect [52].”
BackgroundAttention to Banner Ads and Their Effectiveness: An Eye-Tracking Approach
Lee, J., & Ahn, J.-H. (2012) · International Journal of Electronic Commerce · doi:10.2753/jec1086-4415170105 · Cited by 226 · see citing works
“Attitude toward the advertised brand was collected via questionnaire and assessed by averaging the scores of five nine-point measures: likable/unlikable, unpleasant/pleasant, appealing/unappealing, attractive/unattractive, and bad/good [17, 28].”
MethodGoing with the Flow: Predicting Online Purchase Intentions
Korzaan, M. L. (2003) · Journal of Computer Information Systems · doi:10.1080/08874417.2003.11647530 · Cited by 214 · see citing works
Path Data in Marketing: An Integrative Framework and Prospectus for Model Building
Hui, S. K., Fader, P., & Bradlow, E. T. (2009) · Marketing science (Providence, R.I.) · doi:10.1287/mksc.1080.0400 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
“Marketing researchers have applied eye-tracking methodologies to capture consumers’ eye movements when they view print advertisements (e.g., Janiszewski 1993; Krugman et al. 1994; Pieters et al. 1996, 1999, 2002; Rayner et al. 2001; Rosbergen et al. 1997).”
BackgroundA review of eye-tracking research in tourism
Scott, N., Zhang, R., Le, D., & Moyle, B. (2019) · Current Issues in Tourism · doi:10.1080/13683500.2017.1367367 · Cited by 200 · see citing works
“and Pieters (2008b) have reviewed the use of eye-tracking in advertising studies (print, TV, and banner), health and nutrition warnings (Krugman, Fox, Fletcher, Fischer, & Rojas, 1994), branding (Janiszewski, 1993), and choice, in-store marketing (Chandon,”
BackgroundWhen Can Affective Conditioning and Mere Exposure Directly Influence Brand Choice
Baker, W. (1999) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/00913367.1999.10673594 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
Cherubino, P., Martinez-Levy, A. C., Caratù, M., Cartocci, G., di Flumeri, G., Modica, E., Rossi, D., Mancini, M., & Trettel, A. (2019) · Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience · doi:10.1155/2019/1976847 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
Schwarz, N., Jalbert, M., Noah, T., & Zhang, L. (2020) · Consumer Psychology Review · doi:10.1002/arcp.1067 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Sustainability seen from the perspective of consumers
Hanss, D., & Böhm, G. (2012) · International Journal of Consumer Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1470-6431.2011.01045.x · Cited by 177 · see citing works
Television Advertising and Online SearchPreprint
Joo, M., Wilbur, K. C., & Zhu, Y. (2013) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1720713 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
“For example, if television advertising primarily diverts consumers from competitive generic keyword searches to branded keyword searches, then brands’ television advertising expenditures are more likely to be strategic complements.”
Yoo, C. (2008) · Journal of Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1002/dir.20110 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
“Several marketing studies (Janiszewski, 1993; Shapiro & MacInnis, 1992) employed peripheral placement of advertisements when examining unconscious processing.”
BackgroundThe Role of Emotions in Advertising: A Call to Action
Poels, K., & Dewitte, S. (2019) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/00913367.2019.1579688 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
The Power of Strangers: The Effect of Incidental Consumer Brand Encounters on Brand Choice
Ferraro, R., Bettman, J. R., & Chartrand, T. L. (2008) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/592944 · Cited by 153 · see citing works
Branding consumer goods: insights from theory and practice
Kohli, C. S. (1997) · Journal of Consumer Marketing · doi:10.1108/07363769710166792 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
“This is compounded further by the “mere exposure effect,” which is welldocumented in the psychology literature (Brooks and Watkins, 1989; Janiszewski, 1993; Van Beselaere, 1983; Zajonc, 1968).”
BackgroundAutomatic and Strategic Processes in Advertising Effects
Grunert, K. (1996) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299606000408 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
The Effects of Animation and Format on the Perception and Memory of Online Advertising
Kuisma, J., Simola, J., Uusitalo, L., & Öörni, A. (2010) · Journal of Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2010.07.002 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
Langaro, D., Rita, P., & Salgueiro, M. D. F. (2018) · Journal of Marketing Communications · doi:10.1080/13527266.2015.1036100 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
“…to brand communication reinforces the brand memory traces, generating a greater sense of familiarity, associated with feelings of warmth and proximity towards the brand and activating positive brand attitudes (Seamon, Brody, and Kauff 1983; Janiszewski 1993; Keller 2003b; Hoyer and Brown 1990).”
BackgroundMaking Products Feel Special: When Metacognitive Difficulty Enhances Evaluation
Pocheptsova, A., Labroo, A. A., & Dhar, R. (2010) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.47.6.1059 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Imagery Fluency and Narrative Advertising Effects
Chang, C.-C. (2013) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/00913367.2012.749087 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
“Prior exposures to brand names or product packages enhance fluency and thus result in more favorable product evaluations (Janiszewski 1993).”
BackgroundRomero, M., & Biswas, D. (2016) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1093/jcr/ucw008 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
Wakefield, K. L., Becker-Olsen, K. L., & Cornwell, T. B. (2007) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.2753/joa0091-3367360405 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
The Influence of Affect on Attitude
Clore, G., & Schnall, S. (2005) · doi:10.4324/9781410612823.ch11 · Cited by 144
“, & Kumkale, G. T. (2003). Affect as information in persuasion: A model of affect identification and”
BackgroundInfluentialDuff, B. R. L., & Faber, R. J. (2011) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.2753/joa0091-3367400204 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
“…that may be seen but not explicitly processed, such as billboards, brand logo placements, and Internet banner ads (Matthes, Schemer, and Wirth 2007), and even for print ads that will be ignored while attending to other content, as is often the case with magazines ( Janiszewski 1990, 1993).”
Consumer Behavior Applications to Real Estate Education
Gibler, K., & Nelson, S. (2003) · Journal of Real Estate Practice and Education · doi:10.1080/10835547.2003.12091585 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
“Consumers tend to use perceptual filtering whereby they only pay attention to stimuli deemed relevant to existing needs, wants, beliefs and attitudes and disregard the rest (Janiszewski, 1993).”
BackgroundAnarchy of effects? Exploring attention to online advertising and multiple outcomes
Goodrich, K. (2011) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.20371 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Baum, M., & Kabst, R. (2014) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.21571 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Factors Influencing Clicking of Banner Ads on the WWW
Cho, C.-H. (2003) · CyberPsychology & Behavior · doi:10.1089/109493103321640400 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
“…attention (e.g., newspaper ads adjacent to an editorial) can be processed together with his or her primary task (e.g., reading a newspaper), so that it influences the person’s attitude toward the ad and brand 86 and the product’s likelihood of being included in his or her consideration set.”
Handbook of Consumer Psychology
Haugtvedt, C., Herr, P. M., & Kardes, F. R. (2018) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203809570 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
“Th ere are yet other examples of dissociations that can be explained with the same principle (e.g., Janiszewski, 1993; Krishnan, 1999; Krishnan & Shapiro, 1996).”
BackgroundThe effects of peripheral exposure to information on brand preference
Olson, E. L., & Thjømøe, H. M. (2003) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/03090560310453280 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Dan Ariely, C., & Norton, M. I. (2008) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163536 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
“…fluency—of things " feeling right " —have been shown to impact judgments and behavior ranging from brand and product evaluations (Ferraro et al. 2008, Janiszewski 1993, Labroo et al. 2008, showed that stocks with fluent stock ticker codes (those whose abbreviations were pronounceable) outperformed…”
BackgroundMAPping the Frontiers: Theoretical Advances in Consumer Research on Memory, Affect, and Persuasion
Johar, G., Maheswaran, D., & Peracchio, L. (2006) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/500493 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Consumer behavior: a quadrennium.
Jacoby, J., Johar, G., & Morrin, M. (1998) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.319 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
“Janiszewski (1993) examined the impact of pre-attentive ad processing on affective response to brand names.”
BackgroundA Model of Individual Keyword Performance in Paid Search AdvertisingPreprint
Rutz, O. J., & Bucklin, R. E. (2007) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1024765 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Hornik, R., Parvanta, S., Mello, S., Freres, D. R., Kelly, B., & Schwartz, J. (2013) · Journal of health communication · doi:10.1080/10810730.2013.798381 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
“…years, the general concept of scanning has taken a variety of names in the literature: incidental or mere exposure (Bornstein, Leone, Galley, 1987; Janiszewski, 1993; Obermiller, 1985; Shapiro, 1999; Shapiro, MacInnis, & Heckler, 1997; Tewksbury, Weaver, & Maddex, 2001), incidental information…”
BackgroundTo Challenge or Not to Challenge: Ad-Brand Incongruency and Brand Familiarity
Dahlen, M., & Lange, F. (2004) · The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice · doi:10.1080/10696679.2004.11658522 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
“Familiar brands attract attention in ads (Pechmann and Stewart, 1990; Chattopadhyay, 1998) and they receive more favorable evaluations (Janiszewski, 1993; Holden and Vanhuele, 1999).”
BackgroundSjödin, H., & Törn, F. (2006) · Journal of Consumer Behaviour · doi:10.1002/cb.44 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Product Customization via Starting Solutions
Hildebrand, C., Häubl, G., & Herrmann, A. (2014) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmr.13.0437 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
“Prior work on the metacognitive experience of processing fluency suggests that the more easily a stimulus can be processed, the more positively it tends to be evaluated (Ariely and Norton 2009; Janiszewski 1993; Labroo, Dhar, and Schwarz 2008).”
BackgroundHarris, J. L., & Graff, S. (2012) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2011.300328 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Lim, J. S., Ri, S., Egan, B., & Biocca, F. (2015) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.001 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
“Janiszewski (1993) earlier demonstrated how the incidental exposure to a brand name can increase positive affect as a function of availability of stored representation in memory representation.”
BackgroundHanss, D., Mentzoni, R., Griffiths, M., & Pallesen, S. (2015) · Psychology of Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1037/adb0000062 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Liking What's Familiar: The Importance of Unconscious Familiarity in the Mere-Exposure Effect
Hansen, J., & Wänke, M. (2009) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2009.27.2.161 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
The perceptual fluency effect on pleasurable online shopping experience
Im, H., Lennon, S., & Stoel, L. (2010) · Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1108/17505931011092808 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Implicit Assimilation and Explicit Contrast: A Set/Reset Model of Response to Celebrity Voice-Overs
Forehand, M., & Perkins, A. W. (2005) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/497555 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
“Implicit cognition involves human learning and attitude formation in the absence of overt processing and, in some cases, conscious awareness (Alba and Hutchinson 2000; Bargh and Chartrand 1999; Greenwald and Banaji 1995; Janiszewski 1988, 1993; Janiszewski and Meyvis 2001; Shapiro 1999).”
BackgroundSeeing is not necessarily liking: Advancing research on package design with eye-tracking ☆
Husić-Mehmedović, M., Omeragic, I., Batagelj, Z., & Kolar, T. (2017) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.04.019 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Reuber, A. R., & Fischer, E. M. (2009) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-009-0180-3 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
“Mere exposure to the organization through repeated, but not predominantly negative, coverage can simply increase these individuals' familiarity with it, which, all else being equal, is likely to produce a more favorable attitude (Janiszewski, 1993).”
BackgroundPrerelease Buzz Evolution Patterns and New Product Performance
Xiong, G.-Y., & Bharadwaj, S. G. (2014) · Marketing science (Providence, R.I.) · doi:10.1287/mksc.2013.0828 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
“Beyond the awareness effect, (a) mere exposure to a brand name can promote favorable consumer attitude to the brand (Janiszewski 1993).”
Let’s be strange: brand familiarity and ad‐brand incongruency
Lange, F., & Dahlen, M. (2003) · doi:10.1108/10610420310506010 · Cited by 88
“However, the literature on mere exposure effects and false fame (Janiszewski, 1993; Holden and Vanhuele, 1999) suggests that this may be the optimal advertising response.”
BackgroundEffects of Ad-Brand Incongruence
Dahlen, M., Lange, F., Sjödin, H., & Törn, F. (2005) · Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising · doi:10.1080/10641734.2005.10505178 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
First attention then intention
Milosavljevic, M., & Cerf, M. (2008) · International Journal of Advertising · doi:10.2501/s0265048708080037 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
“About half a dozen marketing studies investigated the role of preattention within the mere exposure phenomenon, but no clear conclusions have been reached (Janiszewski 1993; Shapiro et al .”
BackgroundLiao, L., & Huang, T. (2021) · Information Manager (The) · doi:10.1016/j.im.2021.103481 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Rhee, E. S., & Jung, W. S. (2019) · Journal of Marketing Communications · doi:10.1080/13527266.2018.1461124 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
“Consumer behavior researchers have noted that familiar brands have an advantage over unfamiliar brands in that familiarity enhances attitudes toward the ad and the brand (Campbell and Keller 2003), as well as generating ad attention (Pechmann and Stewart 1990), cutting through ‘ad clutter’ (Dahlén 2001), moderating bo…”
BackgroundHeuristics in Numerical Cognition: Implications for Pricing
Thomas, M. T., & Morwitz, V. (2008) · doi:10.4337/9781848447448.00015 · Cited by 79
Behavioral Research in Real Estate: A Search for the Boundaries
Black, R. T., Brown, G. S., Díaz, J., Gibler, K., & Grissom, T. (2003) · Journal of Real Estate Practice and Education · doi:10.1080/10835547.2003.12091589 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
The effects of television and Internet food advertising on parents and children
Pettigrew, S., Tarabashkina, L., Roberts, M., Quester, P., Chapman, K., & Miller, C. (2013) · Public Health Nutrition · doi:10.1017/s1368980013001067 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
“It was necessary to provide the pictures to ensure respondents were fully aware of the products referred to in the questionnaire, but viewing the pictures would have constituted a level of priming greater than complete non-exposure((53)).”
Background
- Authors
- Janiszewski, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Florida (US)
- Corresponding author
- Janiszewski, Chris
- ORCID
- Janiszewski, Chris
- Venue
- Journal of Consumer Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1993-12
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 376
- ISSN
- 0093-5301 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5277
- OpenAlex
- W2017454365
- Cited by
- 455
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 24
- FWCI
- 5.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Consumer Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
- Keywords
- mere exposure effect, preattentive processing, consumer attitudes, attitude formation, brand familiarity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review