The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Measuring Alliances: the Correlates of War Formal Interstate Alliance Dataset, 1816–2000
Abstract
This article serves as a companion to the release of Version 3.0 of the Correlates of War Formal Interstate Alliance Dataset, 1816–2000. First released in 1966, the Correlates of War alliance data have greatly influenced quantitative studies of conflict, providing an important variable in the study of international conflict and cooperation. The article begins by describing the historical development and the major characteristics of the alliance dataset. The second section then discusses the procedures used to both identify and code each alliance in this revised and extended version of the data, and this is followed by a description of several important changes made to the original coding rules in order to develop this dataset, with the most notable of these changes being a more determined reliance on treaty texts rather than historical accounts for identification of alliances and alliance types. To show the effects of the revised coding decisions and the enlarged temporal domain, the final section of the article presents summary statistics for the new data and then uses the dataset to revisit two existing studies on democracy and alliance behavior. The findings indicate that jointly democratic dyads are likely to be allied only after 1945; joint democracy is negatively related to alliance formation during the 1816–1944 time period.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Alliance Treaty Obligations and Provisions, 1815-1944
Leeds, B. A., Ritter, J., Mitchell, S. M., & Long, A. G. (2002) · International Interactions · doi:10.1080/03050620213653 · Cited by 728
Democracy, Political Similarity, and International Alliances, 1816-1992
Lai, B., & Reiter, D. (2000) · Journal of Conflict Resolution · doi:10.1177/0022002700044002003 · Cited by 332
A revised list of independent states since the congress of Vienna
Gleditsch, K. S., & Ward, M. D. (1999) · International Interactions · doi:10.1080/03050629908434958 · Cited by 296
Singer, J. D., & Small, M. (1966) · Journal of Peace Research · doi:10.1177/002234336600300101 · Cited by 227
Formal Alliances, 1816-1965: an Extension of the Basic Data
Small, M., & Singer, J. D. (1969) · Journal of Peace Research · doi:10.1177/002234336900600305 · Cited by 218
Cited by
News Droughts, News Floods, and U. S. Disaster Relief
Eisensee, T., & Stromberg, D. (2007) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/qjec.122.2.693 · Cited by 567
Community detection in networks with positive and negative links
Traag, V. A., & Bruggeman, J. (2009) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.80.036115 · Cited by 434
Dyadic military conflict, security alliances, and bilateral FDI flows
Li, Q., & Vashchilko, T. (2010) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/jibs.2009.91 · Cited by 280
Sanctions, Signals, and Militarized Conflict
Lektzian, D. J., & Sprecher, C. M. (2007) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00259.x · Cited by 127
Metadata
- Authors
- Gibler, D. M., & Sarkees, M. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Peace Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-03-01
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 211-222
- ISSN
- 0022-3433 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-3578
- OpenAlex
- W2069910571
- Cited by
- 448
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 107.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measuring Alliances: the Correlates of War Formal Interstate Alliance Dataset, 1816–2000. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0022343304041061
- The paper
- Gibler, D. M., & Sarkees, M. R. (2004). Measuring Alliances: the Correlates of War Formal Interstate Alliance Dataset, 1816–2000. Journal of Peace Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343304041061
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.