Cited by 39Political Conflict and GovernanceTransboundary Water Resource ManagementSocial and Intergroup Psychology

Climate and cohesion: The effects of droughts on intra-ethnic and inter-ethnic trust

Open access
De Juan, Alexander, Hänze, Niklas·2021·Journal of Peace Research

Abstract

While a large body of research has highlighted the conflict-inducing effects of climate change, we still know very little about the mechanisms linking environmental conditions to violent conflict. This article investigates the plausibility of a prominent channel according to which scarcity of natural resources can foster violent conflict through deteriorating intergroup relations. In addition to assessing the direct effects of adverse environmental conditions on intra-ethnic and inter-ethnic trust, we suggest a conditional argument on the role of horizontal inequality of hazard exposure. Environmental hazards are ‘unequal’ if they systematically affect ethnic groups differently. While inequality may reinforce intra-ethnic ties and out-group suspicion, equal hazard exposure may create a sense of unity among diverse victims in their collective struggle to cope with harsh environmental conditions. We test these arguments in the context of the severe drought periods that affected most East African countries in the years 2004 and 2005. The empirical analysis combines gridded information on drought severity with geo-located survey data across six countries in the region (Afrobarometer survey 2005/2006). Our main analyses find that exposure to drought hazards correlates positively with self-reported trust within and across ethnic groups. The latter association, however, depends on the degree of intergroup equality of hazard exposure and wanes as inequality increases. Taken together, these findings indicate that if droughts increase the risk of violent conflict, they seem to do so through mechanisms other than intergroup polarization and despite their positive association with ethnic trust. This is most likely the case in contexts where there is pronounced horizontal inequality of drought hazards.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0022343320974096

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
De Juan, A., & Hänze, N.
Affiliations
  • School of Cultural Studies and Social Sciences, University of Osnabrück
  • University of Konstanz (DE)
Venue
Journal of Peace Research
Published
2020-12-23
Volume
58
Issue
1
Pages
151-167
ISSN
  • 0022-3433 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-3578
OpenAlex
W3115237158
Cited by
39
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2
FWCI
5.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Peace Research (publishedVersion)
  • KOPS (University of Konstanz) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Transboundary Water Resource Management
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
drought, climate change and conflict, intergroup trust, intergroup relations, resource constraints, violent conflict, East Africa

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review