Climate and cohesion: The effects of droughts on intra-ethnic and inter-ethnic trust
Open accessAbstract
While a large body of research has highlighted the conflict-inducing effects of climate change, we still know very little about the mechanisms linking environmental conditions to violent conflict. This article investigates the plausibility of a prominent channel according to which scarcity of natural resources can foster violent conflict through deteriorating intergroup relations. In addition to assessing the direct effects of adverse environmental conditions on intra-ethnic and inter-ethnic trust, we suggest a conditional argument on the role of horizontal inequality of hazard exposure. Environmental hazards are ‘unequal’ if they systematically affect ethnic groups differently. While inequality may reinforce intra-ethnic ties and out-group suspicion, equal hazard exposure may create a sense of unity among diverse victims in their collective struggle to cope with harsh environmental conditions. We test these arguments in the context of the severe drought periods that affected most East African countries in the years 2004 and 2005. The empirical analysis combines gridded information on drought severity with geo-located survey data across six countries in the region (Afrobarometer survey 2005/2006). Our main analyses find that exposure to drought hazards correlates positively with self-reported trust within and across ethnic groups. The latter association, however, depends on the degree of intergroup equality of hazard exposure and wanes as inequality increases. Taken together, these findings indicate that if droughts increase the risk of violent conflict, they seem to do so through mechanisms other than intergroup polarization and despite their positive association with ethnic trust. This is most likely the case in contexts where there is pronounced horizontal inequality of drought hazards.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Ethnic polarisation is relevant, but not a primary driver for conflicts.
“this seems in line with De Juan and Heinze [24], who conclude on ethnic polarisation being relevant, but not a primary driver for conflicts.”
From Climate Change, Security, and the Resource Nexus: Case Study of Northern Nigeria and Lake Chad (2021) · cites this paper as De Juan and Heinze [24]
Cites
Don’t blame the weather! Climate-related natural disasters and civil conflict
Slettebak, R. T. (2012) · Journal of Peace Research · doi:10.1177/0022343311425693 · Cited by 212 · see citing works
Detges, A. (2017) · Political Geography · doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2017.07.005 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Climate change, rice crops, and violence
Caruso, R., Petrarca, I., & Ricciuti, R. (2016) · Journal of Peace Research · doi:10.1177/0022343315616061 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Security implications of climate change: A decade of scientific progress
von Uexkull, N., & Buhaug, H. (2021) · Journal of Peace Research · doi:10.1177/0022343320984210 · Cited by 247 · see citing works
Climate Change, Security, and the Resource Nexus: Case Study of Northern Nigeria and Lake Chad
Wakdok, S. S., & Bleischwitz, R. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su131910734 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
- Authors
- De Juan, A., & Hänze, N.
- Affiliations
- School of Cultural Studies and Social Sciences, University of Osnabrück
- University of Konstanz (DE)
- Venue
- Journal of Peace Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2020-12-23
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 151-167
- ISSN
- 0022-3433 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-3578
- OpenAlex
- W3115237158
- Cited by
- 39
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 5.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- nbn-resolving.de
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Peace Research (publishedVersion)
- KOPS (University of Konstanz) (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Transboundary Water Resource Management
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Keywords
- drought, climate change and conflict, intergroup trust, intergroup relations, resource constraints, violent conflict, East Africa
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review