Cited by 212Political Conflict and GovernanceTransboundary Water Resource ManagementEnvironmental and Biological Research in Conflict Zones

Don’t blame the weather! Climate-related natural disasters and civil conflict

Slettebak, Rune T·2012·Journal of Peace Research

Abstract

Abstract The issue of climate change and security has received much attention in recent years. Still, the results from research on this topic are mixed and the academic community appears to be far from a consensus on how climate change is likely to affect stability and conflict risk in affected countries. This study focuses on how climate-related natural disasters such as storms, floods, and droughts have affected the risk of civil war in the past. The frequency of such disasters has risen sharply over the last decades, and the increase is expected to continue due to both climate change and demographic changes. Using multivariate methods, this study employs a global sample covering 1950 to the present in order to test whether adding climate-related natural disasters to a well-specified model on civil conflict can increase its explanatory power. The results indicate that this is the case, but that the relation is opposite to common perceptions: Countries that are affected by climate-related natural disasters face a lower risk of civil war. One worrying facet of the claims that environmental factors cause conflict is that they may contribute to directing attention away from more important conflict-promoting factors, such as poor governance and poverty. There is a serious risk of misguided policy to prevent civil conflict if the assumption that disasters have a significant effect on war is allowed to overshadow more important causes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0022343311425693

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Slettebak, R. T.
Affiliations
Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
Corresponding author
Slettebak, Rune T
Venue
Journal of Peace Research
Published
2012-01-01
Volume
49
Issue
1
Pages
163-176
ISSN
  • 0022-3433 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-3578
OpenAlex
W1964983209
Cited by
212
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 13
FWCI
51.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Peace Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Transboundary Water Resource Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental and Biological Research in Conflict Zones
Keywords
civil conflict, civil war risk, climate change and security, storms, floods, drought, disaster frequency, governance, poverty

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review