Cited by 464Crime Patterns and InterventionsCrime, Deviance, and Social ControlCriminal Justice and Penology

An Empirical Test of a General Theory of Crime: A Four-Nation Comparative Study of Self-Control and the Prediction of Deviance

VAZSONYI, ALEXANDER T., PICKERING, LLOYD E., JUNGER, MARIANNE, HESSING, DICK·2001·Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency

Abstract

The current investigation examined the psychometric properties of Grasmick et al.'s self-control measure and its relationship with deviance on large, representative adolescent samples ( N = 8,417) from Hungary, the Netherlands, Switzerland, and the United States. Important findings indicate that (1) the self-control measure is multidimensional; (2) the self-control measure is tenable for males, females, five different age groups (15-, 16-, 17-, 18-, and 19-year-olds), and adolescents from four different countries; (3) deviance as assessed by the Normative Deviance Scale (NDS) can be reliably measured in different countries; (4) self-control accounts for 10 to 16 percent of the total variance explained in different types of deviance and for 20 percent in total deviance; and (5) developmental processes involving self-control and deviance are largely invariant by national context. The investigation provides further support for the multidimensional self-control measure and its relationship with deviance independent of national context.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0022427801038002001

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In an international sample, controlling for basic demographics, a measure of self-control explained between 10% and 16% of the variance in contemporaneously measured theft, assault, drug use, and vandalism.

    “In an international sample, controlling for basic demographics, a measure of self-control explained between 10% and 16% of the variance in contemporaneously measured theft, assault, drug use, and vandalism (Vazsonyi, Pickering, Junger et al. [2001]).”

    From Personality Psychology and Economics (2011) · cites this paper as Vazsonyi, Pickering, Junger et al. [2001]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
VAZSONYI, A. T., PICKERING, L. E., JUNGER, M., & HESSING, D.
Affiliations
Auburn University (US)
Venue
Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency
Published
2001-05
Volume
38
Issue
2
Pages
91-131
ISSN
  • 0022-4278 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-731X
OpenAlex
W2139078198
Cited by
464
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 32
FWCI
55.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime, Deviance, and Social Control
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
Keywords
self-control, deviance, juvenile delinquency, cross-national comparison, psychometric properties, general theory of crime

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review