The Variable Impacts of Public Housing Community Proximity on Nearby Street Robberies
Abstract
Objectives: Use crime pattern theory to investigate the proximity effects of public housing communities on robbery crime while taking into account the presence of nearby nonresidential facilities. Method: The study uses data describing 41 Philadelphia public housing communities and their surrounds. Surrounds are defined using two increments of street block-sized buffers. Multilevel models (buffer areas nested around public housing communities) allowing the proximity effect to vary across communities and predicting its shape with public housing level predictors are estimated. Results: The multilevel models show that the shape of proximity effects varies across public housing communities and depends on community size, even after factoring in presence of nonresidential facilities. Spatially, multiple public housing communities close to one another have more intense robbery patterns. Conclusions: Labeling all public housing communities as equally criminogenic robbery exporters is unwarranted. In fact, some communities have lower robbery counts than the areas surrounding them. Consequently, effectively addressing robbery in and around public housing communities will require careful consideration of where the problem is located. Locating public housing communities more than two blocks apart may reduce robbery.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
Griffiths, E., & Tita, G. (2009) · Social Problems · doi:10.1525/sp.2009.56.3.474 · Cited by 70 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Alternatively, researchers with access to data about crime locations and both offenders’ and victims’ home addresses might use mobility triangles to better understand offending and victimization patterns among public housing community residents (Griffiths and Tita 2009; Tita and Griffiths 2005).”
BackgroundHolzman, H. R. (1996) · Crime & Delinquency · doi:10.1177/0011128796042003002 · Cited by 49 · cited 4× · see citing works
“public housing, proximity, distance, crime pattern theory, multilevel modeling Public housing is a prominent feature of the urban cores of most American cities (Holzman 1996).”
BackgroundInfluential
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Braga, A. A., MacDonald, J. M., & McCabe, J. E. (2024) · Criminology & Public Policy · doi:10.1111/1745-9133.12679 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Haberman, C. P., Groff, E. R., & Taylor, R. B.
- Affiliations
- Temple University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Haberman, Cory P.
- Venue
- Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2011-11-08
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 163-188
- ISSN
- 0022-4278 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-731X
- OpenAlex
- W2170530878
- Cited by
- 42
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 3.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
- Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
- Keywords
- public housing, street robbery, crime pattern theory, proximity effect, community size, Philadelphia
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review