The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effects of Excerpt Tempo and Duration on Musicians' Ratings of High-Level Piano Performances
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine how judgments of solo performances recorded at an international piano competition might be affected by excerpt duration (20 versus 60 seconds) and tempo (slow versus fast). Musicians rated performances on six test items. Results indicated that piano majors rated slow excerpts higher than they rated fast excerpts, and that they rated slow excerpts higher than nonpiano majors rated either slow or fast excerpts; undergraduates rated long excerpts the same as or slightly higher than they did short excerpts, but graduate students and faculty rated long excerpts markedly higher than short excerpts; and undergraduate piano majors rated performances lower than did undergraduate nonpiano majors, but graduate piano majors and faculty rated performances higher than did graduate/faculty nonpiano majors. Also, accuracy items correlated with each other more highly than they did with other items, and judge ratings were higher for accuracy items than they were for other items. Finally, judge consistency was shown to be related to excerpt duration, excerpt tempo, instrumental major, and level of education. Results generally show that ratings taken after 60 seconds differed from ratings taken after 20 seconds, and that ratings provided evidence that judges were able to distinguish between different test items. November 23, 2004 April 27, 2005.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Considering how common it is for expert raters to disagree when rating music performance quality (Wapnick et al., 2005; Wesolowski et al., 2015), a future study should certainly use a scale with published psychometric data.”
From Acceptance and commitment therapy for the treatment of music performance anxiety: A pilot study with student vocalists (2017) · cites this paper as Wapnick et al., 2005
Citations
Cites
From dissertation abstracts international
(1974) · ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics · doi:10.1145/988616.988619 · Cited by 12,208
Development and validation of the State Hope Scale.
Snyder, C. R. R., Sympson, S. C., Ybasco, F. C., Borders, T. F., Babyak, M. A., & Higgins, R. L. (1996) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.2.321 · Cited by 3,584
Effects of Physical Attractiveness on Evaluation of Vocal Performance
Wapnick, J., Darrow, A.-A., Mazza, J. K., & Dalrymple, L. (1997) · Journal of Research in Music Education · doi:10.2307/3345540 · Cited by 139
Effects of Performer Attractiveness, Stage Behavior, and Dress on Violin Performance Evaluation
Wapnick, J., Mazza, J. K., & Darrow, A.-A. (1998) · Journal of Research in Music Education · doi:10.2307/3345347 · Cited by 128
Relationship of Selected Factors in Trumpet Performance Adjudication Reliability
Fiske, H. E. (1977) · Journal of Research in Music Education · doi:10.2307/3345266 · Cited by 111
Wapnick, J., Mazza, J. K., & Darrow, A. A. (2000) · Journal of Research in Music Education · doi:10.2307/3345367 · Cited by 107
Expert consensus in solo voice performance evaluation
Wapnick, J., & Ekholm, E. (1997) · Journal of Voice · doi:10.1016/s0892-1997(97)80039-2 · Cited by 107
Missouri Journal of Research in Music Education, 1989-1994.
Koch, F. W., Sims, W. L., & Pembrook, R. G. (1994) · Cited by 100
Attractiveness Bias in the Evaluation of Young Pianists' Performances
Ryan, C., & Costa-Giomi, E. (2004) · Journal of Research in Music Education · doi:10.2307/3345436 · Cited by 95
Effects of Listeners' and Performers' Race on Music Preferences
McCrary, J. (1993) · Journal of Research in Music Education · doi:10.2307/3345325 · Cited by 94
Faculty Interjudge Reliability of Music Performance Evaluation
Bergee, M. J. (2003) · Journal of Research in Music Education · doi:10.2307/3345847 · Cited by 90
Development and Validation of a String Performance Rating Scale
Zdzinski, S. F., & Barnes, G. V. (2002) · Journal of Research in Music Education · doi:10.2307/3345801 · Cited by 87
Development and Validation of a Clarinet Performance Adjudication Scale
Abeles, H. F. (1973) · Journal of Research in Music Education · doi:10.2307/3345094 · Cited by 84
Relationships among Faculty, Peer, and Self-Evaluations of Applied Performances
Bergee, M. J. (1997) · Journal of Research in Music Education · doi:10.2307/3345425 · Cited by 76
Judge-Group Differences in the Rating of Secondary School Trumpet Performances
Fiske, H. E. (1975) · Journal of Research in Music Education · doi:10.2307/3344643 · Cited by 75
A Comparison of Faculty, Peer, and Self-Evaluation of Applied Brass Jury Performances
Bergee, M. J. (1993) · Journal of Research in Music Education · doi:10.2307/3345476 · Cited by 72
Effect of Vocal Vibrato and Performer's Sex on Children's Music Preference
LeBlanc, A., & Sherrill, C. (1986) · Journal of Research in Music Education · doi:10.2307/3345258 · Cited by 63
Musicians' Ratings of Good versus Bad Vocal and String Performances
Geringer, J. M., & Madsen, C. K. (1998) · Journal of Research in Music Education · doi:10.2307/3345348 · Cited by 53
Ratings of Violin and Viola Vibrato Performance in Audio-Only and Audiovisual Presentations
Gillespie, R. (1997) · Journal of Research in Music Education · doi:10.2307/3345581 · Cited by 51
Effects of Selected Variables on Musicians’ Ratings of High-Level Piano Performances
Wapnick, J., Ryan, C., Lacaille, N., & Darrow, A.-A. (2004) · International Journal of Music Education · doi:10.1177/0255761404042371 · Cited by 45
The Adjudication of Six Performances of a Chopin Etude: A Study of Expert Knowledge
Thompson, W. F., Diamond, C., & Balkwill, L.-L. (1998) · Psychology of Music · doi:10.1177/0305735698262004 · Cited by 43
Primary and Higher-Order Factors in a Scale Assessing Concert Band Performance.
Bergee, M. J. (1995) · Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education · Cited by 19
Instrumentalists' Assessment of Solo Performances with Compact Disc, Piano, or No Accompaniment
Brittin, R. V. (2002) · Journal of Research in Music Education · doi:10.2307/3345693 · Cited by 14
Who's to Judge? New Insights into Performance Evaluation
Fiske, H. E. (1977) · Music Educators Journal · doi:10.2307/3395371 · Cited by 11
THE EFFECTS OF SYSTEMATICALLY VARYING SELECTED FACTORS ON MUSIC PERFORMANCE ADJUDICATION.
Vasil, T. (1973) · OpenCommons at University of Connecticut (University of Connecticut) · Cited by 8
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Bergee, M.J., 1988, Dissertation Abstracts International, 49, 1086A
- Bergee, M.J., 1995, Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 126, 1
- DCamp, C. B., 1980, Application of the facet-factorial approach to scale construction in the developing of a rating scale for high school band performance.
- Ekholm, E., 1994, The effect of guided listening on evaluation of solo vocal performance.
- Jones, H., 1986, An application of the facet-factorial approach to scale construction in the development of a rating scale for high school solo vocal performance.
- Nichols, J. P., 1991, Dialogue in Instrumental Music Education, 15, 11
- Wagner, M. J., 1991, Missouri Journal of Research in Music Education, 28, 53
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Platz, F., & Kopiez, R. (2012) · Music Perception An Interdisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1525/mp.2012.30.1.71 · Cited by 191
Waddell, G., & Williamon, A. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00513 · Cited by 91
Juncos, D. G., Heinrichs, G. A., Towle, P., Duffy, K., Grand, S. M., Morgan, M. C., Smith, J. D., & Kalkus, E. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00986 · Cited by 77
“Considering how common it is for expert raters to disagree when rating music performance quality (Wapnick et al., 2005; Wesolowski et al., 2015), a future study should certainly use a scale with published psychometric data.”
BackgroundPlatz, F., & Kopiez, R. (2013) · Musicae Scientiae · doi:10.1177/1029864913486369 · Cited by 68
Kinney, D. W. (2009) · Journal of Research in Music Education · doi:10.1177/0022429408328934 · Cited by 45
Metadata
- Authors
- Wapnick, J., Ryan, C., Campbell, L., Deek, P., Lemire, R., & Darrow, A.-A.
- Affiliations
- McGill University (CA)
- Charlene Ryan is an assistant professor of music education at the same institution;
- Patricia Deek is music director at Royal Vale Elementary School and teaches piano in Montreal; her address is 98 Four Seasons Drive, Nean, ON K2E 751;.
- Renata Lemire is an elementary music teacher at Blessed Kateri Elementary School in Edmonton, Alberta; her address is 13547 119 Street, Edmonton, AB TSE;
- Florida State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wapnick, Joel
- Ryan, Charlene
- Campbell, Louise
- Deek, Patricia
- Lemire, Renata
- Darrow, Alice-Ann
- ORCID
- Ryan, Charlene
- Venue
- Journal of Research in Music Education
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2005-07
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 162-176
- ISSN
- 0022-4294 (ISSN-L)
- 1945-0095
- OpenAlex
- W2009804062
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 16.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Research in Music Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Music › Diverse Music Education Insights
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Music › Musicology and Musical Analysis
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
- Keywords
- piano performance, performance evaluation, tempo, solo performance, performance accuracy, music competitions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review