CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 23Diverse Music Education InsightsMusicology and Musical AnalysisNeuroscience and Music Perception

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effects of Excerpt Tempo and Duration on Musicians' Ratings of High-Level Piano Performances

Wapnick, Joel, Ryan, Charlene, Campbell, Louise, Deek, Patricia, Lemire, Renata, Darrow, Alice-Ann·2005·Journal of Research in Music Education
DOI 10.1177/002242940505300206
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine how judgments of solo performances recorded at an international piano competition might be affected by excerpt duration (20 versus 60 seconds) and tempo (slow versus fast). Musicians rated performances on six test items. Results indicated that piano majors rated slow excerpts higher than they rated fast excerpts, and that they rated slow excerpts higher than nonpiano majors rated either slow or fast excerpts; undergraduates rated long excerpts the same as or slightly higher than they did short excerpts, but graduate students and faculty rated long excerpts markedly higher than short excerpts; and undergraduate piano majors rated performances lower than did undergraduate nonpiano majors, but graduate piano majors and faculty rated performances higher than did graduate/faculty nonpiano majors. Also, accuracy items correlated with each other more highly than they did with other items, and judge ratings were higher for accuracy items than they were for other items. Finally, judge consistency was shown to be related to excerpt duration, excerpt tempo, instrumental major, and level of education. Results generally show that ratings taken after 60 seconds differed from ratings taken after 20 seconds, and that ratings provided evidence that judges were able to distinguish between different test items. November 23, 2004 April 27, 2005.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/002242940505300206

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 26 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Bergee, M.J., 1988, Dissertation Abstracts International, 49, 1086A
  2. Bergee, M.J., 1995, Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 126, 1
  3. DCamp, C. B., 1980, Application of the facet-factorial approach to scale construction in the developing of a rating scale for high school band performance.
  4. Ekholm, E., 1994, The effect of guided listening on evaluation of solo vocal performance.
  5. Jones, H., 1986, An application of the facet-factorial approach to scale construction in the development of a rating scale for high school solo vocal performance.
  6. Nichols, J. P., 1991, Dialogue in Instrumental Music Education, 15, 11
  7. Wagner, M. J., 1991, Missouri Journal of Research in Music Education, 28, 53

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 23

Related

Metadata

Authors
Wapnick, J., Ryan, C., Campbell, L., Deek, P., Lemire, R., & Darrow, A.-A.
Affiliations
  • McGill University (CA)
  • Charlene Ryan is an assistant professor of music education at the same institution;
  • Patricia Deek is music director at Royal Vale Elementary School and teaches piano in Montreal; her address is 98 Four Seasons Drive, Nean, ON K2E 751;.
  • Renata Lemire is an elementary music teacher at Blessed Kateri Elementary School in Edmonton, Alberta; her address is 13547 119 Street, Edmonton, AB TSE;
  • Florida State University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Wapnick, Joel
  • Ryan, Charlene
  • Campbell, Louise
  • Deek, Patricia
  • Lemire, Renata
  • Darrow, Alice-Ann
ORCID
Ryan, Charlene
Venue
Journal of Research in Music Education
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2005-07
Volume
53
Issue
2
Pages
162-176
ISSN
  • 0022-4294 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-0095
DOI
10.1177/002242940505300206
OpenAlex
W2009804062
Cited by
23
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
16.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
Journal of Research in Music Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Music › Diverse Music Education Insights
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Music › Musicology and Musical Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
Keywords
piano performance, performance evaluation, tempo, solo performance, performance accuracy, music competitions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review