Music Booster Groups: Alleviating or Exacerbating Funding Inequality in American Public School Music Education?
Abstract
As fundraising has become a key component of American public school music educators’ professional responsibilities, in many places, parent organizations have taken an increasingly outsized role in raising private funds to supplement public school music budgets. The purpose of this study was to understand the finances of public school music parents’ associations and music booster groups and to understand the relation between the socioeconomic status of school communities and the amount of money raised by their local music booster groups. Using Internal Revenue Service (IRS) fiscal 2015 data for 5,575 music booster groups throughout the United States, we found evidence that, collectively, music booster groups raised at least $215 million in support of public school music education. At least four groups raised over $1,000,000; at least 31 raised over $500,000; and at least 723 raised over $100,000 each. We found that total booster revenues were significantly associated with local median household income. Each additional $1,000 of local median household income was associated with an additional $305 in revenue for booster groups filing IRS Form 990-EZ (“short form”) and with an additional $1,637 in revenue for booster groups filing the full IRS Form 990.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Low-SES schools and schools with high proportions of students of color tend to have less music course diversity, fewer curricular resources, fewer financial resources, and unique challenges such as transportation costs and music teacher recruitment.
“Low-SES schools and schools with high proportions of students of color also tend to have less music course diversity, fewer curricular resources, fewer financial resources, and unique challenges such as transportation costs and music teacher recruitment”
From Understanding Participation in Secondary Music Classes: A Literature Review (2020) · cites this paper as Elpus & Grisé, 2019
Higher income schools receive substantially more financial assistance through fundraising, student fees, and booster groups compared with lower socioeconomic schools.
“higher income schools receive substantially more financial assistance through fundraising, student fees, and booster groups when compared with lower socioeconomic schools”
From Understanding Participation in Secondary Music Classes: A Literature Review (2020) · cites this paper as Elpus & Grisé, 2019
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Understanding Participation in Secondary Music Classes: A Literature Review
Pendergast, S. (2020) · Update: Applications of Research in Music Education · doi:10.1177/8755123320928479 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
- Authors
- Elpus, K., & Grisé, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Maryland, College Park (US)
- Corresponding author
- Elpus, Kenneth
- ORCID
- Elpus, Kenneth
- Venue
- Journal of Research in Music Education
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2019-02-05
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 6-22
- ISSN
- 0022-4294 (ISSN-L)
- 1945-0095
- OpenAlex
- W2913618033
- Cited by
- 39
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5
- FWCI
- 46.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Research in Music Education (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Commerce
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Music › Diverse Music Education Insights
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
- Social Sciences › Education › Music Education and Analysis
- Keywords
- public school music education, fundraising, parent organizations, socioeconomic status, median household income, school finance, nonprofit revenue, music education funding
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review