Cited by 70Down syndrome and intellectual disability researchDevelopmental and Educational NeuropsychologyEarly Childhood Education and Development

Proportion of LD Placements Associated with Low Socioeconomic Status: Evidence for a Gradient?

Blair, Clancy, Scott, Keith G.·2002·The Journal of Special Education

Abstract

The purpose of this article was to estimate the proportion of learning disabilities placements associated with variables that can be considered markers for low socioeconomic status. A linked birth record/school record data set for the state of Florida ( n = 159,129) was utilized to examine the occurrence of learning disabilities placements among a single cohort of children with varying levels of risk at birth. Children whose birth records indicated maternal education of less than 12 years, mother unmarried at birth, prenatal care initiation after the first trimester of pregnancy, or low birthweight were at increased risk for a learning disabilities placement by the age of 12 to 14 years. Children with any one of these factors were between 1.2 and 3.4 times more likely to have a learning disability placement by age 12 to 14 years than were children without any of these factors. Analyses indicated that the rate of learning disability placement among children from low-SES backgrounds is greater than would be expected given the rate of placement among children not experiencing low SES. The proportion of placements attributable to the increased risk associated with low SES indicators on the birth certificate was 30% among boys and 39% among girls. The finding of greater-than-expected rates of learning disabilities placement among children facing risks associated with low SES suggests that alternative approaches to prevention may be needed to reduce some proportion of placements.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/00224669020360010201

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Racial/ethnic minorities are more likely to have low socioeconomic status.

    “it is possible that these are valid diagnoses resulting from the greater likelihood of racial/ethnic minorities to have low SES (Blair and Scott 2002; Daniels 1998; MacMillan and Reschly 1998; O'Connor and Fernandez 2006; Skiba et al. 2008).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Blair, C., & Scott, K. G.
Affiliations
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • University of Miami (US)
Corresponding author
Blair, Clancy
Venue
The Journal of Special Education
Published
2002-05
Volume
36
Issue
1
Pages
14-22
ISSN
  • 0022-4669 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4764
OpenAlex
W2142650569
Cited by
70
References
3
Citations by year
2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Journal of Special Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
Keywords
learning disabilities, special education placement, low socioeconomic status, maternal education, maternal marital status, prenatal care timing, low birth weight, school-to-work transition, birth records

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review