Cited by 242Developmental and Educational NeuropsychologyEducation Discipline and InequalitySchool Choice and Performance

Disproportionality and Learning Disabilities: Parsing Apart Race, Socioeconomic Status, and Language

Open access
Shifrer, Dara, Muller, Chandra, Callahan, Rebecca·2011·Journal of Learning Disabilities

Abstract

The disproportionate identification of learning disabilities among certain sociodemographic subgroups, typically groups that are already disadvantaged, is perceived as a persistent problem within the education system. The academic and social experiences of students who are misidentified with a learning disability may be severely restricted, whereas students with a learning disability who are never identified are less likely to receive the accommodations and modifications necessary to learn at their maximum potential. The authors use the Education Longitudinal Study of 2002 to describe national patterns in learning disability identification. Results indicate that sociodemographic characteristics are predictive of identification with a learning disability. Although some conventional areas of disproportionality are confirmed (males and language minorities), differences in socioeconomic status entirely account for African American and Hispanic disproportionality. The discrepancy between the results of bivariate and multivariate analyses confirms the importance of employing multivariate multilevel models in the investigation of disproportionality.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0022219410374236

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 26 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingcitation

    Language minorities are disproportionately identified with learning disabilities.

    “While some conventional areas of disproportionality are confirmed (males and language minorities)”
    • Also stated in: § Who is Identified with a Learning Disability? · plain
      “Ochoa et al. (1988) found that Limited English Proficient (LEP) students are disproportionately placed in classes for students with learning disabilities.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ochoa et al., 1988 source
    • Rests on an assumption: The school's IEP designation for Specific Learning Disability is a valid indicator of learning disability identification.
  • Findingown data

    Socio-demographic characteristics predict whether a student is identified with a learning disability.

    “Results indicate that socio-demographic characteristics are predictive of identification with a learning disability.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The school's IEP designation for Specific Learning Disability is a valid indicator of learning disability identification.
  • Findingown data

    Differences in socioeconomic status fully explain the disproportionality in learning disability identification for African-American and Hispanic students.

    “differences in SES entirely account for African-American and Hispanic disproportionality.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The school's IEP designation for Specific Learning Disability is a valid indicator of learning disability identification.
  • Findingcitation

    Males are disproportionately identified with learning disabilities.

    “While some conventional areas of disproportionality are confirmed (males and language minorities)”
    • Also stated in: § The Case of Males · plain
      “males are from 1.7 to 2.7 times more likely to be identified than females depending on the state, and the gender gap is slightly greater in the South (Coutinho and Oswald 2005).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Coutinho and Oswald 2005 source
    • Rests on an assumption: The school's IEP designation for Specific Learning Disability is a valid indicator of learning disability identification.
  • Findingown data

    The findings confirm disproportionate representation of language minorities, at least for students who have ever been in ESL or who report lack of English proficiency in the 10th grade.

    “our findings confirm the disproportionate representation of language minorities, at least for those who have ever been in ESL or who report a lack of English proficiency in the 10th grade.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 26
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 15
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Grade retention and being older than peers in the 10th grade are significantly associated with increased odds of learning disability identification.

    “Grade retention and being older than peers in the 10th grade are significantly associated with increased odds of identification with a learning disability.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Non-native English speakers were 12% of the analytic sample but 15% of students identified with a learning disability, indicating disproportionate identification.

    “non-native English speakers comprise 12% of the analytic sample but 15% of those identified with a learning disability.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Net of all controls, significant positive predictors of learning disability identification include ever being in ESL or currently lacking English proficiency, while having a non-native-English-speaking parent or starting U.S. schools after early elementary grades are significant negative predictors.

    “Overall, net of all controls, significant positive predictors of identification include having ever been in ESL or currently lacking in English proficiency, while having a parent who is not a native English speaker or having started in U.S. schools anytime after the early elementary grades persist as significant negative predictors.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In Model 6, net of all controls, learning disability identification odds increase by 6% with each additional sibling and decrease by 11% for every one-unit increase in household cognitive resources.

    “Net of all controls, the odds of a student's identification increase by 6% with each additional sibling, and decrease by 11% for every one-unit increase in cognitive resources present in the household (Model 6).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Although socioeconomic status is significantly associated with learning disability identification, it is unclear whether this is due to environmental or prenatal factors or to how schools treat students by socioeconomic background.

    “although SES is significantly associated with identification with a learning disability, it is unclear whether this is due to environmental or prenatal factors, both of which affect childhood development (Natriello, McDill, and Pallas 1990; Shonkoff and Phillips 2000), or the way that schools treat students depending on their socioeconomic background.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Natriello, McDill, and Pallas 1990

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Shonkoff and Phillips 2000

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Family income is consistently negatively associated with learning disability identification, while highest parental education becomes insignificant once covariates of SES and academic history are held constant.

    “In contrast to highest parental education level, which is rendered insignificant once measures of covariates of SES and academic history are held constant, family income is consistently negatively associated with identification.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In Model 2, controls for parental education and family income explained all significant race/ethnicity effects, except Asian students still had 54% lower odds than comparable-SES white students.

    “all of the significant race/ethnicity effects are explained once we account for the systematic differences in SES between these groups by including controls for highest parental education level and family income (Model 2). The one exception is that the odds of being identified for an Asian student are 54% lower than for a white of comparable SES.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In Model 1, Native American students had 1.56 times greater odds and other-race students had 1.42 times greater odds of learning disability identification, but the Native American effect was not significant and the other-race effect was only marginally significant.

    “The odds are also 1.56 times greater for Native Americans and 1.42 times greater for students of any other race (Model 1); the former effect is not significant and the latter is only marginally so”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Males made up 50% of the analytic sample but 66% of students identified with a learning disability, indicating disproportionate identification.

    “Males are disproportionately identified, representing 50% of our analytic sample but 66% of those identified with a learning disability.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In Model 1 controlling for gender, African-American students had 1.43 times greater odds and Hispanic students had 1.49 times greater odds of learning disability identification than white students.

    “the odds of identification with a learning disability are 1.43 times greater for African-Americans and 1.49 times greater for Hispanics compared to whites (the reference category), controlling for gender (Model 1).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In Model 6, ever having been in ESL remained a significant positive predictor and having a non-native-English-speaking parent remained a significant negative predictor of learning disability identification.

    “In Model 6, having been in ESL remains a significant positive predictor and having a non-native-English-speaking parent remains a significant negative predictor of identification.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    A major finding is that learning disability identification is associated with a student's sex, socio-demographic non-cognitive characteristics, and academic history.

    “identification with a learning disability is associated with a student's sex, socio-demographic (non-cognitive) characteristics, and academic history”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Depending on the state, males are 1.7 to 2.7 times more likely than females to be identified with learning disabilities, and the gender gap is slightly larger in the South.

    “males are from 1.7 to 2.7 times more likely to be identified than females depending on the state, and the gender gap is slightly greater in the South (Coutinho and Oswald 2005).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Coutinho and Oswald 2005 source
    • Rests on an assumption: The school's IEP designation for Specific Learning Disability is a valid indicator of learning disability identification.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The inclusion of academic experience and outcome measures was intentionally limited because these may be consequences rather than causes of identification.

    “We are intentionally parsimonious in our inclusion of measures of academic experiences and outcomes, because these may be the result rather than the cause of identification with a learning disability.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Language minority students are identified later and at higher rates than native English speakers, with underrepresentation in kindergarten and first grade and overrepresentation by third grade.

    “Samson and Lesaux (2009) used the nationally representative dataset ECLS-K to determine that language minority students are identified later and in higher proportions than their native-English-speaking peers, being underrepresented in special education in kindergarten and first grade, but overrepresented by the 3rd grade.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Samson and Lesaux 2009 source
    • Rests on an assumption: The school's IEP designation for Specific Learning Disability is a valid indicator of learning disability identification.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Bradley et al. describe three tiers of RTI: research-based instruction for all students, observation of all students for response to instruction, and individualized intensive interventions for students who need them.

    “Bradley et al. (2007) describe the three tiers of RTI as 1) the receipt of research-based instruction by all students, 2) observation of all students for response to instruction, and 3) “individualized and intensive interventions and services” for those students who need it.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bradley et al. 2007 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Multivariate, multilevel modeling of national data that includes student-level measures of identification, socioeconomic status, other socio-demographic characteristics, and academic history is essential.

    “multivariate, multilevel modeling of national data that includes student-level measures of identification, SES, other socio-demographic characteristics, and academic history is essential.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The analytic sample cannot be confidently considered nationally representative, though high-minority and high-poverty proportions were similar between included and excluded schools.

    “Although the proportion of schools that are high-minority and high-poverty within the analytic sample and the sample of excluded schools are similar, we cannot claim with confidence that our analytic sample is nationally representative.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    Due to data constraints, the study cannot thoroughly illuminate the mechanisms by which socio-demographic factors may affect learning disability identification.

    “due to data constraints, we cannot thoroughly illuminate the mechanisms whereby this may occur.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The persistent significant associations between learning disability identification and these characteristics suggest that identification is not socially neutral but is related to structural features of the education system and students' academic histories.

    “The persistent significant associations between identification and these characteristics suggest that identification with a learning disability is not socially neutral, but rather related to structural features of the education system and students' academic histories.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Time-invariant or retrospective measures were chosen to avoid measures that might result from learning disability identification.

    “Since the actual learning disability diagnosis may have occurred before the 10th grade, we were careful to select time invariant or retrospective measures that were not likely to be a result of having been identified with a learning disability.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Data from ELS were collected before RTI implementation, so the findings must be interpreted separately from the RTI approach to identification.

    “Data from ELS, however, were collected prior to the implementation of RTI; consequently, our findings must be interpreted separately from the RTI approach to identification.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Poor and inappropriate diagnostic procedures and/or discrimination may play a role in the disproportionate identification of certain students.

    “Poor and inappropriate diagnostic procedures and/or discrimination may play a role in the disproportionate identification of certain students.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: No research indicates that language minorities should have a higher prevalence of learning disabilities.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The ELS dataset is a strength of the study because it is large and nationally representative of students receiving both special and regular education.

    “the use of a dataset like ELS is a strength of this study – large and nationally representative of students receiving both special and regular education”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    RTI is thought to better account for interpersonal and institutional factors affecting students and to improve practices on a school-wide basis.

    “RTI is thought to better account for “interpersonal and institutional factors” affecting the student and to improve practices on a school-wide basis (Bradley, Danielson, and Doolittle 2007; Harris-Murri, King, and Rostenberg 2006).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Bradley, Danielson, and Doolittle 2007 source
    • cites Harris-Murri, King, and Rostenberg 2006

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The study's results would be strengthened by a more nuanced measure of the type of learning disability.

    “Our results would be bolstered by a more nuanced measure of the type of learning disability.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Previous research confirms that home resources in early childhood positively contribute to the development of cognitive and learning ability.

    “Previous research confirms that resources in the home during early childhood positively contribute to the development of both cognitive and learning ability (Shonkoff and Phillips 2000).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Shonkoff and Phillips 2000

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Despite a 2006 IDEA regulatory guide, the RTI process remains somewhat ambiguous and its effect has not been thoroughly researched.

    “Despite the issuance of an IDEA regulatory guide in 2006, the process of RTI is still somewhat ambiguous and its effect has not been thoroughly researched (Bradley, Danielson, and Doolittle 2007).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bradley, Danielson, and Doolittle 2007 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    African-Americans are disproportionately represented in intervention programs such as Head Start, Chapter 1, and Follow Through, just as they are overrepresented in special education programs.

    “MacMillan and Reschly (1998) point out that African-Americans are disproportionately represented in intervention programs (e.g., Head Start, Chapter 1, Follow Through), just as they are overrepresented in special education programs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites MacMillan and Reschly 1998 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Parental education and family income were used as separate SES measures rather than a composite because each may relate differently to identification.

    “Two distinct basic measures of SES – highest parental education level and family income – were used rather than a composite measure since each component may contribute differentially to identification with a learning disability.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationnone given

    Bivariate analyses depend on the implicit assumption that average backgrounds of different groups are similar and unrelated to the outcome of interest.

    “Bivariate analyses, in contrast to multivariate analyses, depend on the implicit assumption that the average backgrounds of different groups of people are similar and unrelated to the outcome of interest.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Research focusing solely on bivariate analyses neglects possible explanatory factors and may lead to misguided directions for future research and policy-making.

    “Research focusing solely on bivariate analyses inadvertently neglects a myriad of possible explanatory factors, and ultimately may result in misguided directions for future research and policy-making.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Among the schools, 351 reported IEP status for all sampled students, 196 for some, and 204 for none.

    “we were able to determine that 351 of the schools indicated the IEP status of all of the students sampled from their school, 196 schools reported on some of the students sampled, and 204 schools reported on none of the students sampled.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Missing values on all independent variables except race and gender were imputed using mean and mode, and imputation flags were included in multivariate models.

    “Mean and mode imputation was used to account for missing values on all independent variables except for race and gender; imputation flags were included in all multivariate models.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Grade retention dummies were included because retention may correlate with learning disability identification and low-SES students are more likely to be held back.

    “Because of a potential correlation between grade retention and identification with a learning disability, and the greater likelihood of low SES students to be held back, we include four dummies indicating whether the student repeated one or more grades during early elementary (K-2), late elementary (3-5), middle/high school (6-10).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
35 of 35
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The school's IEP designation for Specific Learning Disability is a valid indicator of learning disability identification.

    “We utilize the variable indicating whether the student is identified with a learning disability by their school in the 10th grade1. An Individualized Education Plan (IEP) is enacted when students are identified as eligible for special education services, and the school's designation indicates specifically whether the student has an IEP for a Specific Learning Disability.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Students placed in ESL struggled with English proficiency at some point in their school career.

    “Assuming students placed in ESL struggled with English proficiency at some point in their school career”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Exit from ESL is not always an indication of English proficiency.

    “exit from ESL is not always an indication of English proficiency (Callahan 2005)”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    No research indicates that language minorities should have a higher prevalence of learning disabilities.

    “no research exists indicating that language minorities should have a higher prevalence of learning disabilities.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Federal regulations specify that neither cultural differences nor limited English proficiency should be associated with identification with a learning disability.

    “federal regulations specify that neither cultural differences nor limited English proficiency should be associated with identification with a learning disability”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    A student's report of being a non-native English speaker does not capture the variation in English proficiency among students and across their years of schooling.

    “a student report of being a non-native English speaker does not capture the great variation in English proficiency among students and across their years of schooling”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    More recent immigrants were more likely to report having been in ESL than students who started school in the United States during elementary years.

    “more recent immigrants were more likely to report having been in ESL than students who started school in the United States during the elementary years”
7 of 7

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 49 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Deshler, D.D., 2004, Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 2, 30
  2. Early Childhood Learning & Knowledge Center., 2009, The Early Childhood Learning & Knowledge Center
  3. Education Resources Information Center, 2000, Research Connections in Special Education, 7
  4. Field, M.J., 2006, Workshop on disability in America, a new look: Summary and background papers
  5. Kavale, K.A., 1994, Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 9, 70
  6. Office of Special Education Programs., 2007, 27th annual (2005) report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act
  7. Office of Special Education Programs., History-Twenty-five years of progress in educating children with disabilities through IDEA

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shifrer, D., Muller, C., & Callahan, R.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Corresponding author
Shifrer, Dara
Venue
Journal of Learning Disabilities
Published
2011-05
Volume
44
Issue
3
Pages
246-257
ISSN
  • 0022-2194 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4780
OpenAlex
W2111405197
Cited by
241
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 7
FWCI
8.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Learning Disabilities (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • PDXScholar (Portland State University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (0834177, 5 T32 HD007081, 5 R24 HD042849, 0965444)
  • University of Texas at Austin (R24HD042849, 5 R24 HD042849, 5 T32 HD007081)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R24HD042849, T32HD007081)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education Discipline and Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
Keywords
learning disabilities, disproportionality, special education identification, race, socioeconomic status, language minority students, African American students, Hispanic students, Education Longitudinal Study of 2002, gender differences, academic accommodations
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Black or African American, Female, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Language, Learning Disabilities, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Risk Factors, Sex Factors, Social Class, United States, Multivariate Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-09-28.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-09-28.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review