Cited by 164Teacher Professional Development and MotivationSchool Choice and PerformanceEducation in Rural Contexts

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Whither Didst Thou Go? Retention, Reassignment, Migration, and Attrition of Special and General Education Teachers from a National Perspective

Boe, Erling E., Bobbitt, Sharon A., Cook, Lynne H.·1997·The Journal of Special Education

Abstract

In view of the paucity of national data on teacher retention, transfer, and attrition in special education, and the importance of these phenomena to teacher demand and shortage, we sought to provide such data from a national probability sample of 4,798 public school teachers from the 1988–1989 Teacher Followup Survey (Faupel, Bobbitt, & Friedrichs, 1992). The analysis focused on two main teaching fields (special and general education) and various aspects of teacher turnover. Results showed higher annual turnover for special education teachers (SFTs) than for general education teachers (GETs), in terms of both attrition from public school teaching (SETs = 8%; GETs = 6%) and transfer among public schools (SETs = 13%; GETs = 7%). However, the SET-GET difference in attrition percentages was modest in absolute terms, and lower than those reported from several states. SETs and GETs who left teaching did not differ significantly in postteaching activities or plans to return to teaching. The relationships between teacher turnover and teacher demand, shortage, recruitment, retention, and preparation are discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/002246699703000402

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Boe, E. E., 1992, Teacher supply, demand, and quality: Policy issues, models and data bases
  2. Faupel, E., 1992, 1988--89 teacher followup survey: Data file user's manual (NCES No. 92--058)
  3. Kaufman, S., 1991, 1988 schools and staffing survey sample design and estimation
  4. 10.3102/01623737013003256 · DOI
  5. McKnab, P., 1995, Attrition of special education personnel in Kansas from 1993--94 to 1994--95
  6. Office of Special Education Programs, 1994, Sixteenth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Education of Handicapped Act
  7. Parshall, L., 1990, A study of the special education workforce in Michigan
  8. Rollefson, M. R., 1995, Teacher supply in the United States: Sources of newly hired teachers in public and private schools 1988--1991
  9. Schrag, J. A., The adequacy of current and projected special education personnel supply in Washington state.
  10. Whitener, S., 1994, 1991--92 teacher followup survey data file user's manual: Public use version.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 164

Metadata

Authors
Boe, E. E., Bobbitt, S. A., & Cook, L. H.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • United States Department of Education (US)
  • California State University, Northridge (US)
Venue
The Journal of Special Education
Published
1997-01
Volume
30
Issue
4
Pages
371-389
ISSN
  • 0022-4669 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4764
OpenAlex
W1971622433
Cited by
164
References
14
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 9
FWCI
19.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Journal of Special Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Professional Development and Motivation
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education in Rural Contexts
Keywords
teacher attrition, teacher turnover, special education teachers, general education teachers, teacher migration, teacher retention, teacher shortage, teacher recruitment, public school teachers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review