Cited by 19Media Studies and CommunicationRace, History, and American SocietyJournalism and Media Studies

Press Coverage of Black Statewide Candidates: The Case of L. Douglas Wilder of Virginia

Jeffries, Judson L.·2002·Journal of Black Studies

Abstract

This article examines the newspaper treatment of L. Douglas Wilder's 1985 lieutenant governor's campaign and his 1989 gubernatorial campaign. Using content analysis, the author analyzes one liberal newspaper and one conservative newspaper, both of which serve the Virginia area. This article found that although these publications devoted most of their attention to the Wilder campaigns, they also gave the majority of negative coverage to the Wilder campaigns. Some of the coverage included unflattering references to Wilder's race. In sum, this study supports the claim by Black politicians that the media often distort and misrepresent the campaigns of Black office seekers in a way that makes it difficult for them to garner White votes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/00234702032006003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jeffries, J. L.
Affiliations
Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Corresponding author
Jeffries, Judson L.
Venue
Journal of Black Studies
Published
2002-07
Volume
32
Issue
6
Pages
673-697
ISSN
  • 0021-9347 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-4566
OpenAlex
W2064173199
Cited by
19
References
0
Citations by year
2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Black Studies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Media Studies and Communication
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Race, History, and American Society
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Journalism and Media Studies
Keywords
media coverage, racial stereotypes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review