Press Coverage of Black Statewide Candidates: The Case of L. Douglas Wilder of Virginia
Abstract
This article examines the newspaper treatment of L. Douglas Wilder's 1985 lieutenant governor's campaign and his 1989 gubernatorial campaign. Using content analysis, the author analyzes one liberal newspaper and one conservative newspaper, both of which serve the Virginia area. This article found that although these publications devoted most of their attention to the Wilder campaigns, they also gave the majority of negative coverage to the Wilder campaigns. Some of the coverage included unflattering references to Wilder's race. In sum, this study supports the claim by Black politicians that the media often distort and misrepresent the campaigns of Black office seekers in a way that makes it difficult for them to garner White votes.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Intersectionality and Press Coverage of Political Campaigns
Ward, O. (2017) · The International Journal of Press/Politics · doi:10.1177/1940161216673195 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
- Authors
- Jeffries, J. L.
- Affiliations
- Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
- Corresponding author
- Jeffries, Judson L.
- Venue
- Journal of Black Studies
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2002-07
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 673-697
- ISSN
- 0021-9347 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-4566
- OpenAlex
- W2064173199
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Black Studies (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Media Studies and Communication
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Race, History, and American Society
- Social Sciences › Communication › Journalism and Media Studies
- Keywords
- media coverage, racial stereotypes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review