The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Phonetic Diversity, Statistical Learning, and Acquisition of Phonology
Abstract
In learning to perceive and produce speech, children master complex language-specific patterns. Daunting language-specific variation is found both in the segmental domain and in the domain of prosody and intonation. This article reviews the challenges posed by results in phonetic typology and sociolinguistics for the theory of language acquisition. It argues that categories are initiated bottom-up from statistical modesin use of the phonetic space, and sketches how exemplar theory can be used to model the updating of categories once they are initiated. It also argues that bottom-upinitiation of categories is successful thanks to the perceptionproduction loop operating in the speech community. The behavior of this loop means that the superficial statistical properties of speech available to the infant indirectly reflect the contrastiveness and discriminability of categories in the adult grammar. The article also argues that the developing system is refined using internal feedback from type statistics over the lexicon, once the lexicon is well-developed. The application of type statistics to a system initiated with surface statistics does not cause a fundamental reorganization of the system. Instead, it exploits confluences across levels of representation which characterize human language and make bootstrapping possible.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Control Methods Used in a Study of the Vowels
Peterson, G. E., & Barney, H. L. (1952) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1906875 · Cited by 2,837 · cited 1×
“Analyzing vowel data from Peterson and Barney (1952), Kornai claimed that English vowels correspond to rather distinct clusters in the formant space, and as a result can be acquired from unsupervised cluster analysis (e.g., cluster analysis carried out without any feedback from higher levels about…”
BackgroundWerker, J. F., & Tees, R. C. (1984) · Infant Behavior and Development · doi:10.1016/s0163-6383(84)80022-3 · Cited by 2,801
Cited by
Bybee, J. (2010) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511750526 · Cited by 3,488
Trofimovich, P., & Baker, W. (2006) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263106060013 · Cited by 576
PRIMIR: a developmental framework of infant speech processing
Werker, J. F., & Curtin, S. (2005) · Language Learning and Development · doi:10.1080/15475441.2005.9684216 · Cited by 484
Exemplar models, evolution and language change
Wedel, A. B. (2006) · The Linguistic Review · doi:10.1515/tlr.2006.010 · Cited by 351
McMurray, B., & Jongman, A. (2011) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0022325 · Cited by 272
Metadata
- Authors
- Pierrehumbert, J. B.
- Venue
- Language and Speech
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2003-06
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 115-154
- ISSN
- 0023-8309 (ISSN-L)
- 1756-6053
- OpenAlex
- W2113332115
- Cited by
- 588
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phonetic Diversity, Statistical Learning, and Acquisition of Phonology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/00238309030460020501
- The paper
- Pierrehumbert, J. B. (2003). Phonetic Diversity, Statistical Learning, and Acquisition of Phonology. Language and Speech. https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309030460020501
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.