The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Perception of Mandarin Lexical Tones when F0 Information is Neutralized
Abstract
In tone languages, the identity of a word depends on its tone pattern as well as its phonetic structure. The primary cue to tone identity is the fundamental frequency (F0) contour. Two experiments explore how listeners perceive Mandarin monosyllables in which all or part of the F0 information has been neutralized. In Experiment 1, supposedly critical portions of the tonal pattern were neutralized with signal processing techniques, yet identification of the tonal pattern remained quite good. In Experiment 2, even more drastic removal of tonal information was tested, using stimuli whispered by Mandarin speakers, or signal processed to remove the pitch cues. Again, performance was surprisingly good, showing that listeners can use secondary cues when the primary cue is unavailable. Moreover, a comparison of tone perception of naturally whispered monosyllables and the signal processed ones suggests that Mandarin speakers promote the utility of secondary cues when they know that the primary cue will be unavailable. The flexible use of cues to tone in Mandarin is similar to the flexibility that has been found in the production and perception of cues to phonetic identity in Western languages.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Referring as a collaborative process
Clark, H. H., & Wilkes-Gibbs, D. (1986) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(86)90010-7 · Cited by 2,401
Cited by
What Can Lexical Tone Training Studies in Adults Tell Us about Tone Processing in Children?
Antoniou, M., & Chin, J. L. L. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00001 · Cited by 294
Perceptual learning of Cantonese lexical tones by tone and non-tone language speakers
Francis, A. L., Ciocca, V., Ma, L., & Fenn, K. (2008) · Journal of Phonetics · doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2007.06.005 · Cited by 256
Cross-Language Transfer of Reading Ability: Evidence From Taiwanese Ninth-Grade Adolescents
Chuang, H.-K., Joshi, R. M., & Dixon, L. Q. (2012) · Journal of Literacy Research · doi:10.1177/1086296x11431157 · Cited by 74
Identification of Minimal Pairs of Japanese Pitch Accent in Noise-Vocoded Speech
Sugiyama, Y. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.887761 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, S., & Samuel, A. G.
- Venue
- Language and Speech
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2004-06
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 109-138
- ISSN
- 0023-8309 (ISSN-L)
- 1756-6053
- OpenAlex
- W2091131547
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Perception of Mandarin Lexical Tones when F0 Information is Neutralized. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/00238309040470020101
- The paper
- Liu, S., & Samuel, A. G. (2004). Perception of Mandarin Lexical Tones when F0 Information is Neutralized. Language and Speech. https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309040470020101
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.