Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 294

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 112 of the 112 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

What Can Lexical Tone Training Studies in Adults Tell Us about Tone Processing in Children?

Open access
Antoniou, Mark, Chin, Jessica L. L.·2018·Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract

A growing number of studies on the acquisition of lexical tone by adult learners have revealed that factors such as language background, musical experience, cognitive abilities, and neuroanatomy all play a role in determining tone learning success. On the basis of these findings, it has been argued that the effectiveness of tone learning in adulthood depends on individual differences in these factors. However, it is not clear whether similar individual differences play an analogous role in tone learning in childhood. Indeed, relatively few studies have made comparisons between how adults and children learn lexical tones. Here, we review recent developments for tone learning in both adults and children. The review covers tone training in a range of contexts, including in naive listeners, in native speakers of other tone languages, in listeners with varying levels of musical experience, and in individuals with speech and hearing disorders. Finally, we discuss the parallels between adult and child tone learning, and provide recommendations concerning how findings in adult tone training can provide insights into tone learning for children by accommodating the needs of individual learners.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00001

Cites

112 of 112 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 112 references

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Burnham, 1997, “The role of linguistic experience in the perception of Thai tones,” in, Southeast Asian Linguistic Studies in Honour of Vichin Panupong, 29
  2. Caldwell-Harris, 2015, Factors influencing sensitivity to lexical tone in an artificial language: implications for second language learning., Stud. Second Lang. Acquis., 37, 335, 10.1017/S0272263114000849 · DOI
  3. Cheung, 2014, Cantonese tone production performance of mainstream school children with hearing impairment., Int. J. Speech Lang. Pathol., 16, 624, 10.3109/17549507.2014.896942 · doi:10.3109/17549507.2014.896942
  4. Fu, 2015, Benefits of music training in Mandarin-speaking pediatric cochlear implant users., J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res., 58, 163, 10.1044/2014_JSLHR-H-14-0127 · doi:10.1044/2014_jslhr-h-14-0127
  5. Gottfried, 1997, Effect of linguistic experience on the identification of Mandarin Chinese vowels and tones., J. Phon., 25, 207, 10.1006/jpho.1997.0042 · doi:10.1006/jpho.1997.0042
  6. Ingvalson, 2013, Poorer phonetic perceivers show greater benefit in phonetic-phonological speech learning., J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res., 56, 1045, 10.1044/1092-4388(2012/12-0024) · doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2012/12-0024
  7. Nguyen, 2009, Tonal language processing in congenital amusia., Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 1169, 490, 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04855.x · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04855.x
  8. Ong, 2017, Learning novel musical pitch via distributional learning., J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn., 43, 150, 10.1037/xlm0000286 · doi:10.1037/xlm0000286
  9. Quam, 2012, “What’s in a rise? Effects of language experience on interpretation of lexical tone,” in, Proceedings of the 36th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, 487
  10. Showalter, 2013, Unfamiliar orthographic information and second language word learning: a novel lexicon study., Second Lang. Res., 29, 185, 10.1177/0267658313480154 · doi:10.1177/0267658313480154
  11. Singh, 2016, Rise and fall: Effects of tone and intonation on spoken word recognition in early childhood., J. Phon., 55, 109, 10.1016/j.wocn.2015.12.005 · doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2015.12.005
  12. So, 2005, The effect of L1 prosodic backgrounds of Cantonese and Japanese speakers on the perception of Mandarin tones after training., J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 117, 2427, 10.1121/1.4786607 · doi:10.1121/1.4786607
  13. Wong, 2009, The perception of lexical tone contrasts in Cantonese children with and without specific language impairment (SLI)., J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res., 52, 1493, 10.1044/1092-4388(2009/080170) · doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2009/080170
  14. Wu, 2008, Perception of Mandarin tones by Mandarin and english listeners., J. Chin. Lang. Comput., 18, 175
  15. Zhang, 2012, Auditory training in patients with unilateral cochlear implant and contralateral acoustic stimulation., Ear Hear., 33, e70, 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318259e5dd · doi:10.1097/aud.0b013e318259e5dd

Metadata

Authors
Antoniou, M., & Chin, J. L. L.
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2018-01-23
Volume
9
Pages
1-1
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2790049070
Cited by
294
References
112
FWCI
66.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold
Funders
Australian Research Council (DE150101053)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: What Can Lexical Tone Training Studies in Adults Tell Us about Tone Processing in Children? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00001
The paper
Antoniou, M., & Chin, J. L. L. (2018). What Can Lexical Tone Training Studies in Adults Tell Us about Tone Processing in Children? Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00001

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.