Social Class, Linguistic Codes and Grammatical Elements
Abstract
In a previous paper (Bernstein, 1962) two general types of linguistic code, elaborated and restricted, were proposed. These codes were regarded as functions of different forms of social relationships. The codes were thought to entail qualitatively different verbal planning orientations which control different modes of self-regulation and levels of cognitive behaviour. Social class differences in the use of these codes were expected. Speech samples were obtained and the hesitation phenomena analysed, from a discussion situation involving small groups of middle and working class subjects with varying I.Q. profiles. It was found that the middle-class groups used a shorter phrase length and a longer pause interval than the working-class group. These differences in the hesitation phenomena were sharper when working-class and middle-class groups, matched for intelligence on a group verbal and non-verbal test, were compared. It was considered that the members of the two class groups were oriented to qualitatively different levels of verbal planning which control lexicon and structural selections. The working-class groups were thought to be making selections from a lower level of the linguistic hierarchy; whilst the middle-class subjects irrespective of verbal I.Q. were oriented to making selections from a higher level of the hierarchy. This paper will report the analysis of the speech.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Differing cultural awareness and linguistic acumen undermines the mythology of the English education system being meritocratic.
“The English education system purports to enhance social mobility, through knowledge acquisition, critical analysis, abstract conceptualisation and reflection, however we would suggest that differing cultural awareness and linguistic acumen under mines the mythology of it being a meritocratic system.”
From The strange case of querying Gove's cultural capital legacy (2023) · cites this paper as Bernstein 1962
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Signs of Social Class: The Experience of Economic Inequality in Everyday Life
Kraus, M. W., Park, J. W., & Tan, J. J. X. (2017) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691616673192 · Cited by 288 · see citing works
The strange case of querying Gove's cultural capital legacy
Birkenshaw, C., & Temple Clothier, A.-L. (2023) · Pedagogy, Culture & Society · doi:10.1080/14681366.2021.1933144 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“The restricted and elaborated codes identified by Bernstein (1962) represent some of the tribal dialects associated with social class and provide just one example of the complex linguistic and cultural capital that young people develop, and have assessed, during schooling.”
Background
- Authors
- Bernstein, B.
- Affiliations
- University College London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Bernstein, Basil
- Venue
- Language and Speech
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1962-10
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 221-240
- ISSN
- 0023-8309 (ISSN-L)
- 1756-6053
- OpenAlex
- W2341461363
- Cited by
- 277
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 87.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Language and Speech (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Linguistic Variation and Morphology
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Linguistic and Sociocultural Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
- Keywords
- social class, linguistic codes, elaborated code, restricted code, hesitation, speech pauses, phrase length, middle class, working class, intelligence, linguistic hierarchies, self-regulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review