A Perceptual Study of Mandarin Tones 2 and 3
Abstract
Due to their similar concave shapes, Tones 2 and 3 are said to be the most confusable pair in Mandarin, and no reliable perceptual cues have been found. The purpose of this perceptual study was to find (1) the perceptual cues for discriminating these two tones, and (2) the possible causes of listeners' misidentifications. Experiment 1 was designed to test the hypothesis that the timing of the turning point may constitute a perceptual cue. Two fundamental frequency continua were superimposed on the syllable [wu] and the location of the turning point was manipulated in each. A binary forced-choice identification test was given to Mandarin listeners. The results show that the distinction between Tones 2 and 3 is cued by the timing of the turning point, which is correlated with the degree of the initial fall. In Experiment 2, ten minimal pairs of Tones 2 and 3 spoken by four native speakers were presented to Mandarin listeners for labeling. Acoustic analysis of the mis-labeled tokens indicates that mistakes occurred when the correlation between the timing of the turning point and the degree of the initial fall was violated.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Speaker normalization in the perception of Mandarin Chinese tones
Moore, C. B., & Jongman, A. (1997) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.420092 · Cited by 270 · see citing works
- Authors
- Shen, X. S., & Lin, M.
- Affiliations
- The University of Texas at Austin (US)
- Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (CN)
- Venue
- Language and Speech
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1991-04
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 145-156
- ISSN
- 0023-8309 (ISSN-L)
- 1756-6053
- OpenAlex
- W2336183687
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Language and Speech (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
- Keywords
- Mandarin tones, tone perception, fundamental frequency, acoustic cues, minimal pairs
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review