Cited by 75Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative DiseasesDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchPharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Central Anticholinergic Hypersensitivity in Aging

Ray, P.G., Meador, K.J., Loring, D.W., Zamrini, E.W., Yang, X.-H., Buccafusco, J.J.·1992·Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology

Abstract

Although neurochemical reductions in cholinergic systems have been found to occur during aging, such changes do not necessarily translate to functional deficits. The cognitive deficits of normal aging have been attributed in part to hypo-cholinergic function, but anticholinergic hypersensitivity in the elderly has not been systematically documented. To test the cholinergic hypothesis of aging, we investigated the effects of scopolamine on memory and attention in healthy young and elderly subjects. Treatments included intramuscular glycopyrrolate (0.0044 mg/kg) and scopolamine (0.002, 0.004, and 0.007 mg/kg) in a randomized double-blind design. The test battery included the Selective Reminding Task (SRT), Digit Span, Paired Associates Learning (PAL), Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT), and the Continuous Performance Task. Elderly controls were more impaired at lower scopolamine doses than were the young on SRT, PAL, and SDMT. These results demonstrate anticholinergic hypersensitivity and are consistent with decremental changes in cholinergic status during normal aging. ( J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 1992;5:72–77).

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/002383099200500203

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. 10.1126/science.7046051 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1001/archneur.1974.00490320001001 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/0197-4580(80)90022-6 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/S0163-1047(86)90772-7 · DOI
  5. 10.1093/brain/111.5.1079 · DOI
  6. 10.1093/brain/99.3.459 · DOI
  7. 10.1093/brain/102.2.333 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/0006-8993(77)90758-2 · DOI
  9. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1983.tb11837.x · DOI
  10. 10.1007/978-1-4684-8893-7_16 · DOI
  11. 10.1212/WNL.34.6.741 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/0304-3940(77)90070-2 · DOI
  13. 10.1093/ageing/9.1.1 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/S0140-6736(77)92114-6 · DOI
  15. 10.1212/WNL.24.11.1019 · DOI
  16. Lezak MD, 1983, Neuropsychological Assessment
  17. Smith A, 1982, Symbol Digit Modalities Test Manual
  18. 10.1016/0028-3908(87)90269-3 · DOI
  19. Ostfield AM, 1962, J Pharmacol Exp Ther, 137, 131
  20. Safer DJ, 1971, Biol Psychiatry, 3, 347
  21. Hartlage LC, 1982, Anticonvulsant medication as a determinant of neuropsychological test profiles, cited in Smith A: Symbol Digit Modalities Test Manual
  22. 10.1037/0022-006X.48.2.228 · DOI
  23. 10.1007/BF00431761 · DOI
  24. 10.1007/BF00431793 · DOI
  25. 10.1126/science.174.4011.788 · DOI
  26. 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1973.tb08379.x · DOI
  27. 10.1016/B978-0-12-269950-4.50012-6 · DOI
  28. Warburton DM, 1975, Brain, Behavior and Drugs
  29. 10.1007/BF00427761 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/0001-6918(85)90020-4 · DOI
  31. Marcusson J, 1984, Clin Neuropharmacol, 7, 38
  32. Martin W, 1985, J Neurol, 25, 232
  33. Robinson DS, 1975, Fed Proc, 34, 103
  34. 10.1001/archpsyc.1977.01770130091009 · DOI
  35. 10.1126/science.6334363 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 75

Metadata

Authors
Ray, P. G., Meador, K. J., Loring, D. W., Zamrini, E. W., Yang, X.-H., & Buccafusco, J. J.
Affiliations
Augusta University (US)
Venue
Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology
Published
1992-04
Volume
5
Issue
2
Pages
72-77
ISSN
  • 0891-9887 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5708
OpenAlex
W1992268087
Cited by
75
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Aging (AG00314)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Keywords
normal aging, scopolamine, glycopyrrolate, memory, attention, cognitive impairment, paired-associate learning, Symbol Digit Modalities Test, continuous performance test, digit span
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aging, Arousal, Cerebral Cortex, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Double-Blind Method, Female, Glycopyrrolate, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Synaptic Transmission, Neuropsychological Tests, Mental Recall, Receptors, Cholinergic, Scopolamine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review