The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Microscopical Focal Destruction (Tunnels) in Exhumed Human Bones
Abstract
This is a survey of microscopical focal destruction in exhumed human bones from several countries and burial times. The single change (destruction) seen in these bones contrasts with the sequence of changes in pathological processes (destruction, cellular infiltration, new bone formation and healing). The absence of cells stresses the importance of size and shape, in three dimensions, and contents of the destructive foci. Focal mineral redeposition (e.g. cuffing) is characteristic of most forms of tunnels, and is usually associated with focal loss of mineral and bone matrix, partial or whole. In one kind of foci/tunnels (Wedl's) redeposition is restricted to packed osteons. The accumulation of the waste products of the invading organism in the surrounding tissue may hinder or stop the growth of the organism and consequential bone destruction. Later the redeposited mineral may be leached out and the bone thus ‘returned to normal’ will allow further growth of the invader and renewed destruction. Desiccation after exhumation soon ‘fixes’ the redeposited mineral. Mineral redeposition is never found in pathological changes. Examination of transverse and longitudinal sections together with the comparison of the changes in the mid-zone of cortical bone with those in the inner and outer zones is helpful in understanding the progress of the changes. No invasion by organisms of the lamellar tissue from the osteon canals was seen although this must be the rule. The tunnels in bones and teeth are compared, and show that the contents are, with one exception, not related to any anatomical structure. There is only destruction, and no new bone can be laid down in these postmortem changes. One kind of focus/tunnel does not change into or overlap another. The results of experimental burials in garden soils were indecisive. Four kinds of such well-defined changes are described, but the examination of specimens from a wider range of provenances will almost certainly reveal others and may call for modifications of the conclusions of this paper. The cause of these changes is yet to be established; it is not physico-chemical, but is probably bacterial or fungal. Although the invasion must proceed from the cortical surfaces via the osteon canals, these canals persist in even the oldest specimens. These foci/tunnels probably occur in buried bones throughout the world where the inhumation environment is favourable. They have been reported from early geological periods, and in this study were found in pterodactyl bones from the Jurassic period about 190 million years ago. Complete packing of exhumed bone tissue with microscopical destructive foci/tunnels can completely obscure the pattern of pathological changes. The application of more sophisticated techniques would contribute to the fuller understanding of these changes and their causes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gilman, J. C. (1957) · Soil Science · doi:10.1097/00010694-195708000-00021 · Cited by 813
The Three-Dimensional Anatomy of Haversian Systems
COHEN, J., & HARRIS, W. H. (1958) · The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery · doi:10.2106/00004623-195840020-00015 · Cited by 189
Fungal osteoclasia: a model of dead bone resorption
Marchiafava, V., BONUCCI, E., & Ascenzi, A. (1974) · Calcified Tissue International · doi:10.1007/bf02060295 · Cited by 131
Collagen and a Cellulose-like Substance in Fossil Dentine and Bone
ISAACS, W. A., Little, K., Currey, J. D., & Tarlo, L. B. H. (1963) · Nature · doi:10.1038/197192a0 · Cited by 38
The isolation and amino acid composition of the bone collagen in pleistocene mammals
Ho, T.-Y. (1966) · Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology · doi:10.1016/0010-406x(66)90193-9 · Cited by 32
Cited by
The survival of organic matter in bone: a review
Collins, M. J., Nielsen–Marsh, C. M., Hiller, J., Smith, C. I., Roberts, J. P., Prigodich, R. V., Wess, T. J., Csapò, J., Millard, A. R., & Turner–Walker, G. (2002) · Archaeometry · doi:10.1111/1475-4754.t01-1-00071 · Cited by 615
Patterns of Diagenesis in Bone I: The Effects of Site Environments
Nielsen-Marsh, C. M., & Hedges, R. E. M. (2000) · Journal of Archaeological Science · doi:10.1006/jasc.1999.0537 · Cited by 443
Characterisation of microbial attack on archaeological bone
Jans, M. M. E., Nielsen-Marsh, C. M., Smith, C. I., Collins, M. J., & Kars, H. (2004) · Journal of Archaeological Science · doi:10.1016/j.jas.2003.07.007 · Cited by 377
Domínguez-Rodrigo, M., & Barba, R. (2006) · Journal of Human Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2005.09.005 · Cited by 288
The thermal history of human fossils and the likelihood of successful DNA amplification
Smith, C. I., Chamberlain, A. T., Riley, M. S., Stringer, C., & Collins, M. J. (2003) · Journal of Human Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0047-2484(03)00106-4 · Cited by 268
Metadata
- Authors
- Hackett, C. J.
- Venue
- Medicine, Science and the Law
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1981-10
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 243-265
- ISSN
- 0025-8024 (ISSN-L)
- 2042-1818
- OpenAlex
- W2472436033
- Cited by
- 334
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 18.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Microscopical Focal Destruction (Tunnels) in Exhumed Human Bones. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/002580248102100403
- The paper
- Hackett, C. J. (1981). Microscopical Focal Destruction (Tunnels) in Exhumed Human Bones. Medicine, Science and the Law. https://doi.org/10.1177/002580248102100403
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.