Cited by 36Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationCOVID-19 and Mental HealthDigital Mental Health Interventions

Psychological support and psychotherapy via digital devices in Covid-19 emergency time: Some critical issues

Tullio, Valeria, Perrone, Giulio, Bilotta, Clio, Lanzarone, Antonietta, Argo, Antonina·2020·Medico-Legal Journal

Abstract

The Covid-19 pandemic and the resulting fear, quarantine and lockdown measures implemented in Italy and other countries to contain the risk of contagion have seriously impacted the mental health of a large number of people. The need to offer psychological and psychotherapeutic support to these people, while respecting the government’s pressing calls to “stay home”, have led many psychologists and psychotherapists, both in the public and private sectors, to provide their professional services via teleconference, telephone, smartphone, etc. The aim of this work is to highlight some critical issues related to the sudden switch from the traditional method of providing psychological services to the digital one in Italy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0025817220926942

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Further risks of telemental health include loss of privacy and deterioration in therapeutic relationships.

    “Further risks include the loss of privacy and deterioration in therapeutic relationships [1,10-12].”
  • Staff participation in telemental health is impeded by technological and environmental difficulties, and staff express reservations regarding quality of assessments, deterioration of therapeutic relationships, and limited focus on physical as well as mental health.

    “Staff participation is also impeded by technological and environmental difficulties, and they express reservations regarding the quality of assessments, deterioration of therapeutic relationships, and limitations in the extent to which there is a focus on physical as well as mental health [8,11,12].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tullio, V., Perrone, G., Bilotta, C., Lanzarone, A., & Argo, A.
Affiliations
University of Palermo (IT)
Corresponding author
Tullio, Valeria
Venue
Medico-Legal Journal
Published
2020-06-03
Volume
88
Issue
2
Pages
73-76
ISSN
  • 0025-8172 (ISSN-L)
  • 2042-1834
OpenAlex
W3029766928
Cited by
36
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 15
FWCI
5.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medico-Legal Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Nova Science Publishers (Nova Science Publishers, Inc.) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, external beam radiotherapy, digital mental health services, psychological support, psychotherapy, lockdown, quarantine, mental health outcomes, teleconsultation, Italy
MeSH terms
Betacoronavirus, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Confidentiality, Humans, Informed Consent, Italy, Mental Health Services, Pneumonia, Viral, Quarantine, Computer Security, Telemedicine, Coronavirus Infections, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review