Cited by 7Grief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthSuicide and Self-Harm StudiesDeath, Funerary Practices, and Mourning

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Japanese Undergraduates’ Attitudes Toward Students Survivors of Parental Suicide: A Comparison With Other Stigmatized Deaths

Yamanaka, Akira·2015·OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying

Abstract

This study investigated Japanese undergraduates' attitudes toward a fellow student whose parent has died by suicide. One hundred thirty-four participants responded to four versions of a brief fictional case describing a male undergraduate whose father had died. These presented fictional cases described the cause of the death as being suicide, cancer, AIDS, or murder. Results indicated that participants had more negative attitudes toward the suicide survivor student than the nonstigmatized death (cancer) survivor. Further, results indicated that participants viewed suicide survivors as more to blame for the death and had a more negative image of them than of the other stigmatized death (AIDS and murder) survivors.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0030222814568290

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These studies suggest that suicide survivors are perceived more negatively than survivors of other modes of death, such as being viewed as more psychologically disturbed, blamed more for the death, and less likeable.

    “These studies suggest that suicide survivors are perceived more negatively than survivors of other modes of death, such as that they are viewed as more psychologically disturbed, are blamed more for the death and are less likeable (e.g. [65–67]).”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Calhoun L. G., 1981, Journal of Psychiatric Treatment and Evaluation, 3, 99
  2. Cho Y., 2006, Hito wa Naze Jisatsu Surunoka: Shinrigakutekiboukenchosa kara Mietekurumono [Why people kill themselves: The findings from psychological autopsy study]
  3. Fukuda S., 2006, Japanese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 6, 185
  4. Rudestam K. E., 1987, Suicide and its aftermath: Understanding and counseling the survivors, 31
  5. The Cabinet Office, 2010, Heisei 22 Nenban Jisatsu Taisaku Hakusyo. [2010 White paper on preventive measures against suicide]
  6. Yamanaka A., 2009, Japanese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 9, 382

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Yamanaka, A.
Affiliations
Hokkai Gakuen University (JP)
Corresponding author
Yamanaka, Akira
Venue
OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying
Published
2015-03-10
Volume
71
Issue
1
Pages
82-91
ISSN
  • 0030-2228 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-3764
OpenAlex
W2124208333
Cited by
7
References
11
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2
FWCI
1.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
Keywords
parental suicide, suicide survivors, stigma, attitudes toward suicide, blame attribution, cancer, AIDS, murder, Japanese university students, fictional case study
MeSH terms
Attitude to Death, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Japan, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Parents, Students, Suicide, Survivors, Young Adult, Social Stigma

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review