Cited by 8Grief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthDeath, Funerary Practices, and MourningReligion, Spirituality, and Psychology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

“As if Nothing Happened”: Experiences of Bereaved Parents in Romania

Thieleman, Kara, Cacciatore, Joanne·2020·OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying

Abstract

Prior research has found high levels of distress in parents who experience the death of a child; however, Romanian parents, whose experiences are influenced by the nation’s shared historical trauma, have not been studied. This mixed-methods study found very high levels of distress in a sample of 237 bereaved parents in Romania, primarily women. Specifically, 89% of respondents scored above the clinical cutoff for trauma responses, 66% did so for anxious responses, and 82% did so for depressive responses. Qualitative analyses of respondents’ narratives suggest that, through complex interactions between political, social, and medical systems, the lack of care after the death of a child seems to incite additional distress in parents. These findings warrant further exploration of traumatic grief in Romania, especially in the context of historical and political trauma, and of ways in which support can be provided to grieving parents in this unique cultural milieu.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0030222818799949

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cross-cultural studies with women highlight culturally-specific understandings and practices relating to loss of a baby that can impact grief.

    “However, while the impact of cultural diversity is yet to be explored in men, cross-cultural studies with women highlight a range of culturally-specific understandings and practices relating to the loss of a baby that can impact upon grief [105–109].”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Burlea A., 2012, Revista de Cercetare si Interventie Socialia, 39, 100
  2. Martian N. (2015). Romania has highest infant mortality rate in Europe. Business Review. Retrieved from http://www.business-review.eu/featured/romania-has-highest-infant-mortality-rate-in-europe-84496
  3. van der Sijpt E., 2017, Medical Anthropology, 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Thieleman, K., & Cacciatore, J.
Affiliations
Arizona State University (US)
Corresponding author
Thieleman, Kara
Venue
OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying
Published
2018-09-13
Volume
81
Issue
4
Pages
685-705
ISSN
  • 0030-2228 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-3764
OpenAlex
W2891052537
Cited by
8
References
23
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1
FWCI
2.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Arizona State University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Keywords
traumatic grief, bereaved parents, death of a child, parental grief, historical trauma, political trauma, Romania, bereavement support, depression, anxiety, trauma response, grief narratives
MeSH terms
Adult, Bereavement, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Male, Parents, Pregnancy, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Romania, Stillbirth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review