Cited by 189School Choice and PerformanceCritical Race Theory in EducationEducational Assessment and Improvement

Closing the Achievement Gap by Detracking

Burris, Carol Corbett, Welner, Kevin G.·2005·Phi Delta Kappan

Abstract

Achievement follows from opportunities, Ms. Burris and Mr. Welner a s s e rt, and the persistent practice of tracking denies a range of o p p o rtunities to large numbers of students. That a dispro p o rtionate number of these students are minorities is one of the underlying reasons that the achievement gap has remained so persistent. The authors describe how a diverse suburban district in New York narrowed the gap by offering its high-track curriculum to all students.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/003172170508600808

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Race/ethnicity has been an indicator utilized to track students.

    “race/ethnicity (Akos et al., 2007;Alvarez & Mehan, 2007;Burris, & Welner, 2005;Hallinan, 1991;Kelly, 2007;Lee & Byrk, 1988;Lewis, 2007;Lewis & Cheng, 2006;Oakes & Guiton, 1995;Rubin, 2006;Welner & Oakes, 1996;Yonezawa et al., 2002)”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Burris, C. C., & Welner, K. G.
Affiliations
Arizona State University (US)
Venue
Phi Delta Kappan
Published
2005-04
Volume
86
Issue
8
Pages
594-598
ISSN
  • 0031-7217 (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-6487
OpenAlex
W96176629
Cited by
189
References
5
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 11
FWCI
30.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Phi Delta Kappan (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Race Theory in Education
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Educational Assessment and Improvement
Keywords
achievement gap, educational tracking, detracking, suburban school districts, minority students, educational equity, curriculum access

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review