Superintendents in Classrooms: From Collegial Conversation to Collaborative Action
Abstract
537-545
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is little published empirical research on what happens inside either Instructional Rounds or Learning Rounds.
“In common with other forms of professional learning community, there is little published empirical research on what happens inside either Instructional Rounds or Learning Rounds.”
From Teacher agency and professional learning communities; what can Learning Rounds in Scotland teach us? (2017) · cites this paper as Rallis et al 2006
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Teacher agency and professional learning communities; what can Learning Rounds in Scotland teach us?
Philpott, C., & Oates, C. (2017) · Professional Development in Education · doi:10.1080/19415257.2016.1180316 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
- Authors
- Rallis, S., Tedder, J., Lachman, A., & Elmore, R.
- Venue
- Phi Delta Kappan
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2006-03
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 537-545
- ISSN
- 0031-7217 (ISSN-L)
- 1940-6487
- OpenAlex
- W1983186371
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 5.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Phi Delta Kappan (publishedVersion)
- ScholarWorks@UMassAmherst (University of Massachusetts Amherst) (submittedVersion)
- Scholarworks (University of Massachusetts Amherst) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Leadership and Practices
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
- Social Sciences › Education › School Leadership and Teacher Performance
- Keywords
- school superintendents, classroom leadership, school leadership, teacher collaboration, collaborative action
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
