Maximizing the Power of Formative Assessments
Abstract
Formative assessment, done well, represents one of the most powerful instructional tools available to a teacher or a school for promoting student achievement. Teachers and schools can use formative assessment to identify student understanding, clarify what comes next in their learning, trigger and become part of an effective system of intervention for struggling students, inform and improve the instructional practice of individual teachers or teams, help students track their own progress toward attainment of standards, motivate students by building confidence in themselves as learners, fuel continuous improvement processes across faculties, and, thus, drive a school's transformation. Common assessments--those created collaboratively by teams of teachers who teach the same course or grade level--also represent a powerful tool in effective assessment in professional learning communities. Put the two together and the result can redefine the role of assessment in school improvement. But this synergy can be achieved only if certain conditions are satisfied. Three specific questions: How can common formative assessments contribute to productive instructional decision making? How can we make sure those assessments are of high quality? How can we ensure they are used in ways that benefit student learning? Our driving purpose is to maximize the positive impact of common assessments used to promote both student and teacher success. ASSESSMENT AND INSTRUCTIONAL DECISION MAKING If assess…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/003465430298487 · Cited by 12,905 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Searching for stages of teacher’s skills in assessment
Christoforidou, M., Kyriakides, L., Antoniou, P., & Creemers, B. P. M. (2014) · Studies in Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.11.006 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Student learning objectives: a Rhode Island case study
Pollins, T. A. (2021) · doi:10.17760/d20018700
- Authors
- Stiggins, R., & DuFour, R.
- ORCID
- Stiggins, Rick
- Venue
- Phi Delta Kappan
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2009-05
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 640-644
- ISSN
- 0031-7217 (ISSN-L)
- 1940-6487
- OpenAlex
- W2038676985
- Cited by
- 135
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 36.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Phi Delta Kappan (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Educational Assessment and Improvement
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
- Keywords
- formative assessment, common assessments, instructional decision-making, professional learning communities, teacher collaboration, assessment quality, learning progression, curriculum mapping, summative assessment, academic performance, school improvement, struggling students, student motivation, standards-based assessment, teaching improvement, school transformation, continuous improvement, student self-monitoring, teacher self-assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review